e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
[X] |
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended April 2, 2010 |
|
|
[ ] |
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File No. 000-25826
HARMONIC INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0201147 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
549 Baltic Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
(408) 542-2500
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [ ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer [X] |
|
Accelerated filer [ ] |
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ] |
|
Smaller reporting company [ ] |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock, $.001 par value, was 96,920,203
on April 30, 2010.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
HARMONIC INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value amounts)
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
155,960 |
|
|
$ |
152,477 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
111,838 |
|
|
|
118,593 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,814 and $5,163 |
|
|
70,041 |
|
|
|
64,838 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
39,609 |
|
|
|
35,066 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
26,503 |
|
|
|
26,503 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
24,043 |
|
|
|
20,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
427,994 |
|
|
|
418,298 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
28,750 |
|
|
|
25,941 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
64,637 |
|
|
|
63,953 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
22,649 |
|
|
|
25,265 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
24,048 |
|
|
|
22,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
568,078 |
|
|
$ |
556,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
21,217 |
|
|
$ |
22,065 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
41,391 |
|
|
|
32,855 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
31,092 |
|
|
|
37,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
95,375 |
|
|
|
93,113 |
|
Accrued excess facilities costs, long-term |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Income taxes payable, long-term |
|
|
41,391 |
|
|
|
43,948 |
|
Financing liability, long-term |
|
|
11,127 |
|
|
|
6,908 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
150,629 |
|
|
|
148,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 15 and 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000 shares authorized;
96,882 and 96,110 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
2,284,954 |
|
|
|
2,279,945 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(1,867,214 |
) |
|
|
(1,872,533 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
417,449 |
|
|
|
407,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
568,078 |
|
|
$ |
556,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
HARMONIC INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
74,434 |
|
|
$ |
59,907 |
|
Service revenue |
|
|
10,388 |
|
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
84,822 |
|
|
|
67,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product cost of sales |
|
|
41,010 |
|
|
|
38,681 |
|
Service cost of sales |
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales |
|
|
44,016 |
|
|
|
42,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
40,806 |
|
|
|
25,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
16,966 |
|
|
|
14,496 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
20,845 |
|
|
|
21,290 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
38,345 |
|
|
|
36,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
(10,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
(9,926 |
) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
(2,845 |
) |
|
|
8,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
(18,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
96,684 |
|
|
|
95,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
97,344 |
|
|
|
95,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
HARMONIC INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
(18,843 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
Net loss on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash adjustments, net |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(5,204 |
) |
|
|
17,329 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(4,512 |
) |
|
|
4,583 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(1,101 |
) |
|
|
9,524 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,356 |
) |
|
|
(3,203 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,445 |
|
|
|
(3,068 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
Accrued excess facilities costs |
|
|
(1,697 |
) |
|
|
(1,556 |
) |
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(4,613 |
) |
|
|
(16,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(2,979 |
) |
|
|
(4,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(35,367 |
) |
|
|
(60,657 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
41,292 |
|
|
|
33,013 |
|
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,715 |
|
Acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
Acquisition of Rhozet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(453 |
) |
Acquisition of Scopus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
(66,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,483 |
|
|
|
(69,000 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
152,477 |
|
|
|
179,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
155,960 |
|
|
$ |
110,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax payments, net |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock for Rhozet acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
HARMONIC INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which Harmonic Inc.
(Harmonic, or the Company) considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
operations for the interim periods covered and the consolidated financial condition of the Company
at the date of the balance sheets. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction
with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2010.
The interim results presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations
that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, or any other future period.
The Companys fiscal quarters are based on 13-week periods, except for the fourth quarter which
ends on December 31.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The year-end condensed balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Reclassifications. The Company has reclassified certain prior period balances to conform to the
current year presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on previously reported total
assets, total liabilities, stockholders equity, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 2: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for revenue recognition with multiple
deliverables. This guidance impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables included
in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally,
this guidance modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the
separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating
arrangement consideration. This revised guidance is effective for us beginning in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2011; however early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact, if any, of the adoption of the revised accounting guidance on its consolidated
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for the accounting for certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. This guidance amends the scope of pre-existing
software revenue guidance by removing from the guidance non-software components of tangible
products and certain software components of tangible products. This revised guidance is effective
for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011; however early adoption is permitted. The
Company does not expect this guidance to significantly impact the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued updated guidance related to fair value measurements and
disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant
transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for
the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose separately information about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than one net number).
The updated guidance also requires that an entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures
for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs
used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for Level 2
and Level 3 fair value measurements. The updated
guidance is effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2009, except for
5
the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll
forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption by the
Company in the first quarter of 2010 did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
NOTE 3: SCOPUS ACQUISITION
On March 12, 2009, Harmonic completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity interests of Scopus
Video Networks Ltd., or Scopus, a publicly traded company based in Israel. Scopus was engaged in
the development and support of digital video networking products that allowed network operators to
transmit, process, and manage digital video content. Scopus primary products included integrated
receivers/decoders (IRD), intelligent video gateways (IVG), and encoders. In addition, Scopus
marketed multiplexers, network management systems (NMS), and other ancillary technology to its
customers.
The acquisition of Scopus strengthened Harmonics technology and market leadership, particularly in
the broadcast contribution and distribution markets. The acquisition extended Harmonics
diversification strategy, providing it with an expanded international sales force and global
customer base, particularly in video broadcast, contribution and distribution markets, as well as
complementary video processing technology and expanded research and development capability. In
addition, the acquisition provided an assembled workforce, the implicit value of future cost
savings as a result of combining entities, and is expected to provide Harmonic with future
unidentified new products and technologies. These opportunities were significant factors to the
establishment of the purchase price, which exceeded the fair value of Scopus net tangible and
intangible assets acquired resulting in goodwill of approximately $22.8 million that was recorded
in connection with this acquisition.
The purchase price, net of $23.3 million of cash acquired, was $63.1 million, which was paid from
existing cash balances. The Company also incurred a total of $3.4 million of transaction expenses,
which were expensed as selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2009.
There were no contingent consideration arrangements in connection with the acquisition.
The assets and liabilities of Scopus were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition.
Further, any associated restructuring activities will be expensed in future periods and not
recorded through purchase accounting as previously done under prior accounting guidance. Subsequent
to the acquisition, the Company recorded expenses of $8.2 million in the year ended December 31,
2009, primarily for excess and obsolete inventories related to product discontinuances and
severance costs.
6
The results of operations of Scopus are included in Harmonics Consolidated Statements of
Operations from March 12, 2009, the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the
allocation of the purchase price based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired |
|
$ |
23,316 |
|
Investments |
|
|
1,899 |
|
Accounts receivable (Gross amount due from accounts receivable of $6,977) |
|
|
6,308 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
15,899 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
4,280 |
|
Other tangible assets acquired |
|
|
2,312 |
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Existing technology |
|
|
10,100 |
|
In-process technology |
|
|
2,400 |
|
Patents/core technology |
|
|
3,500 |
|
Customer contracts and related relationships |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Trade names/trademarks |
|
|
2,100 |
|
Order backlog |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Maintenance agreements and related relationships |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
22,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
101,961 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(336 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(12,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
86,369 |
|
Less: cash acquired |
|
|
(23,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchase price |
|
$ |
63,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price set forth in the table above was based on the fair value of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of March 12, 2009. The Company used an
overall discount rate of 16% to estimate the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, which
was derived based on financial metrics of comparable companies operating in Scopus industry. In
determining the appropriate discount rates to use in valuing each of the individual intangible
assets, the Company adjusted the weighted average cost of capital of 16% giving consideration to
the specific risk factors of each asset. The following methods were used to value the identified
intangible assets:
|
|
|
The fair value of the existing technology assets acquired was established based on their
highest and best used by a market participant using the Income Approach. The Income
Approach included an analysis of the markets, cash flows and risks associated with
achieving such cash flows to calculate the fair value. As of the acquisition date, Scopus
was developing new versions and incremental improvements to its IRD, encoder and IVG
products; |
|
|
|
|
The in-process projects were at a stage of development that required further research
and development to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability. The fair value
of the in-process technology assets acquired was based on the valuation premise that the
assets would be In-Use using a discounted cash flow model; |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of patents/core technology assets acquired was established based on a
variation of the Income Approach called the Profit Allocation Method. In the Profit
Allocation Method, we estimated the value of the patents/core technology by capitalizing
the profits saved because Harmonic owns the technology; |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the customer contracts and related relationships assets acquired was
based on the Income Approach; |
7
|
|
|
The fair value of the maintenance agreements and related relationships assets acquired
was based on the Income Approach; |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of trade names/trademarks assets acquired was established based on the
Profit Allocation Method, and |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of backlog acquired was established based on the Cost Savings Approach. |
Identified intangible assets are being amortized over the following useful lives:
|
|
|
Existing technology is estimated to have a useful life between three years and five
years; |
|
|
|
|
In-process technology is being amortized upon completion over its projected remaining
useful life as assessed on the completion date. Three of the in-process projects were
completed in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the remaining three projects were completed in
the first quarter of 2010. The completed technology is estimated to have useful lives
between three and six years; |
|
|
|
|
Patents/core technology are being amortized over their useful life of four years; |
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts and related relationships are being amortized over their useful life
of between four years and five years; |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance agreements and related relationships are being amortized over their useful
life of four years, and |
|
|
|
|
Trade name/trademarks are being amortized over their useful lives of five years; and |
|
|
|
|
Order backlog was amortized over its useful life of six months. |
The existing technology, patents/core technology, customer contracts, maintenance agreements and
related relationships, trade name/trademarks and backlog are being amortized using the
straight-line method which reflects the future projected cash flows.
The residual purchase price of $22.8 million has been recorded as goodwill. The goodwill as a
result of this acquisition is not deductible for federal tax purposes.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presented below summarizes the combined
results of operations as if the merger had been completed on January 1, 2009. The unaudited pro
forma financial information for the three months ended April 3, 2009 combines the results for
Harmonic for the three months ended April 3, 2009, and the historical results of Scopus through
March 12, 2009, the date of acquisition. The pro forma financial information is presented for
informational purposes only and does not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had
the merger actually been completed on such date or of results which may occur in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
72,084 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(29,409 |
) |
Net loss per share basic |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
Net loss per share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
For the period from March 13, 2009 to April 3, 2009, Scopus products contributed revenues of $1.5
million and a net loss of $8.3 million. Included in the loss for the first quarter are excess and
obsolete inventories expense of $5.8 million and severance expenses of $1.1 million.
8
NOTE 4: FAIR VALUE
The applicable accounting guidance establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
required disclosure about the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. This guidance
requires the Company to classify and disclose assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, as well as fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured on a
nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial measurement, in a three-tier fair value
hierarchy as described below.
The guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques
used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
|
|
|
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company primarily uses broker
quotes for valuation of its short-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
The Company uses the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and
liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. During the three months ended
April 2, 2010, there were no nonrecurring fair value measurements of assets and liabilities
subsequent to initial recognition.
The following table sets forth the fair value of the Companys financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of April 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 based on the
three-tier fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
April 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
117,274 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
117,274 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
34,231 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
34,231 |
|
Corporate commercial paper |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
7,194 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
7,194 |
|
U.S. federal government bonds |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
33,112 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
33,112 |
|
State, municipal and local
government agencies bonds |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
33,877 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
33,877 |
|
Foreign government debt
securities |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
117,274 |
|
|
$ |
109,635 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
226,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
114,898 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
114,898 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
35,707 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
35,707 |
|
U.S. federal government bonds |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
46,536 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
46,536 |
|
State, municipal and local
government agencies
bonds |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
30,381 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
30,381 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
114,898 |
|
|
$ |
118,593 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
233,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Estimated |
(In thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
April 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal, state, municipal
and local government agencies
bonds |
|
$ |
66,922 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
66,989 |
|
Foreign government debt securities |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
41,393 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
41,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
109,417 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
109,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal, state,
municipal and local government
agencies bonds |
|
$ |
76,712 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
76,917 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
35,655 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
35,707 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
5,744 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,111 |
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
118,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Investments
Harmonic monitors its investment portfolio for impairment on a periodic basis. In the event that
the carrying value of an investment exceeds its fair value and the decline in value is determined
to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis for the
investment is established. In order to determine whether a decline in value is
other-than-temporary, the Company evaluates, among other factors: the duration and extent to which
the fair value has been less than the carrying value; the Companys financial condition and
business outlook, including key operational and cash flow metrics, current market conditions and
future trends in our industry; and the Companys relative competitive position within the industry.
At the present time, the Company does not intend to sell its investments that have unrealized
losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In addition, the Company does not believe
that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell its investments that have
unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) before the Company recovers the
principal amounts invested. The Company believes that the unrealized losses are temporary and do
not require an other-than-temporary impairment, based on our evaluation of available evidence as of
April 2, 2010.
As of April 2, 2010, there were no individual available-for-sale securities in a material
unrealized loss position and the amount of unrealized losses on the total investment balance was
insignificant.
NOTE 5: INVENTORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
8,774 |
|
|
$ |
8,633 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
28,394 |
|
|
|
23,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,609 |
|
|
$ |
35,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NOTE 6: GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIED INTANGIBLES
The following is a summary of goodwill and intangible assets as of April 2, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
(In thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
Identified intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed core technology |
|
$ |
65,391 |
|
|
$ |
(50,016 |
) |
|
$ |
15,375 |
|
|
$ |
64,864 |
|
|
$ |
(48,013 |
) |
|
$ |
16,851 |
|
In-process technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
Customer
relationships/contracts |
|
|
37,897 |
|
|
|
(33,828 |
) |
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
37,900 |
|
|
|
(33,541 |
) |
|
|
4,359 |
|
Trademarks and tradenames |
|
|
7,357 |
|
|
|
(5,284 |
) |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
7,369 |
|
|
|
(5,136 |
) |
|
|
2,233 |
|
Supply agreements |
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
(3,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance agreements
and related
relationships |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
1,195 |
|
Software license,
intellectual property
and assembled workforce |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
Order backlog |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of
identified
intangibles |
|
|
117,962 |
|
|
|
(95,313 |
) |
|
|
22,649 |
|
|
|
118,069 |
|
|
|
(92,804 |
) |
|
|
25,265 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
64,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,637 |
|
|
|
63,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill and other
intangibles |
|
$ |
182,599 |
|
|
$ |
(95,313 |
) |
|
$ |
87,286 |
|
|
$ |
182,022 |
|
|
$ |
(92,804 |
) |
|
$ |
89,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended April 2, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Goodwill
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
63,953 |
|
Adjustment to deferred tax liability associated with the
Scopus acquisition |
|
|
786 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
64,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 2, 2010, the Company recorded a total of $2.6 million of
amortization expense for identified intangibles, of which $2.1 million was included in cost of
sales. For the three months ended April 3, 2009, the Company recorded a total of $1.9 million of
amortization expense for identified intangibles, of which $1.5 million was included in cost of
sales. The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets with definite lives
is as follows:
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Total
|
2010 (remaining 9 months) |
|
$ |
6,012 |
|
|
$ |
1,601 |
|
|
$ |
7,613 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,214 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
6,338 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
2014 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
2015 |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,396 |
|
|
$ |
7,253 |
|
|
$ |
22,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NOTE 7: RESTRUCTURING AND EXCESS FACILITIES
The Company has recorded restructuring and excess facilities charges beginning in 2001 and
throughout subsequent years as a result of changing conditions in the use of its facilities in the
United States and the United Kingdom, or UK. The initial expenses that had been recorded to
selling, general and administrative expense and the related liabilities have been adjusted
periodically for changes in sublease income estimates.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a total of $7.4 million of expenses related to
activities resulting from the Scopus acquisition, including the termination of approximately 65
Scopus employees. A charge of $6.3 million was recorded in cost of sales, consisting of excess and
obsolete inventories expenses from product discontinuances and severance expenses for terminated
Scopus employees. Research and development expenses were $0.6 million for terminated Scopus
employees. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $0.5 million consisting primarily
of severance expenses for terminated Scopus employees. Substantially all of the severance was paid
during the three months ended April 3, 2009.
As of
April 2, 2010, accrued excess facilities cost totaled
$3.6 million, substantially all of which was
included in current accrued liabilities and is expected to be paid in the remainder of 2010. The
Company incurred cash outlays of $1.7 million during the first three months of 2010 principally for
lease payments, property taxes, insurance and other maintenance fees related to vacated facilities.
Harmonic reassesses this liability quarterly and adjusts as necessary based on changes in the
timing and amounts of expected sublease rental income.
The following table summarizes the activities in the restructuring accrual during the first quarter of
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
Campus |
|
BTL |
|
Scopus |
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Facilities
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
Closure
|
|
Facilities
|
|
Total
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
Provisions/(recoveries) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease income |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(1,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8: CREDIT FACILITIES AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Harmonic has a bank line of credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, which provides for borrowings
of up to $10.0 million that matures on March 2, 2011. As of April 2, 2010, other than standby
letters of credit and guarantees (Note 15), there were no amounts outstanding under the line of
credit facility and there were no borrowings in 2009 or 2010. This facility, which was amended and
restated in March 2010, contains a financial covenant with the requirement for Harmonic to maintain
unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, net of credit extensions, of not
less than $35.0 million. If Harmonic is unable to maintain this cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments balance, Harmonic would not be in compliance with the facility. In the event
of noncompliance by Harmonic with the covenants under the facility, Silicon Valley Bank would be
entitled to exercise its remedies under the facility which include declaring all obligations
immediately due and payable. At April 2, 2010, Harmonic was in compliance with the covenants under
this line of credit facility. Future borrowings pursuant to the line would bear interest at the
banks prime rate (4.0% at April 2, 2010). Borrowings are payable monthly and are not
collateralized.
NOTE 9: FINANCING LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
In December 2009, the Company entered into a lease for a building in San Jose, California that will
replace its current facility as corporate headquarters. In January 2010, the Company began a
build-out of this facility and expects to incur approximately $21.5 million in construction costs.
Under the terms of the lease, the landlord will reimburse up to $18.8 million of these construction
costs. Because certain improvements constructed by the
Company were considered structural in nature and the Company is responsible for any cost overruns,
the Company
12
is considered to be the owner of the construction project for accounting purposes under
applicable accounting guidance on the effect of lessee involvement in asset construction.
Therefore, the Company capitalized the fair
value of the building of $6.9 million with a corresponding credit to financing liability. The fair
value was determined as of December 31, 2009 using a combination of the sales comparison approach
and the income capitalization approach. For the quarter ended April 2, 2010, the liability
increased by $4.1 million primarily due to the addition of leasehold improvements. Each major
construction element will be capitalized and amortized over its useful life.
Upon completion of construction, the Company will assess whether or not it qualifies for
sale-leaseback accounting under applicable accounting guidance. Should the Company qualify for
sale-leaseback accounting, the building and corresponding liability will be removed from the
balance sheet and rental payments due over the term of the lease will be recorded as rental expense
on a straight-line basis.
NOTE 10: BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Option Plans. Harmonic has reserved 13,857,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under
various employee stock option plans. Stock options are granted for periods not exceeding ten years
and generally vest 25% at one year from date of grant, and an additional 1/48 per month thereafter.
Restricted stock units have no exercise price and generally vest over four years with 25% vesting
at one year from date of grant or the vesting commencement date chosen for the award, and either an
additional 1/16 per quarter thereafter, or 1/8 semiannually thereafter. Restricted stock units
granted reduce the number of shares reserved for grant under the plans by two shares for every unit
granted. Stock options are granted having exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the
stock at the date of grant. Beginning on February 27, 2006, option grants have a term of seven
years. Certain awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. In the first
quarter of 2010 and 2009, employees received restricted stock units valued at $8.7 million and $6.6
million, respectively.
Director Option Plans. In May 2002, Harmonics stockholders approved the 2002 Director Option Plan
(the Plan), replacing the 1995 Director Option Plan. In June 2006, Harmonics stockholders
approved an amendment to the Plan and increased the maximum number of shares of common stock
authorized for issuance over the term of the Plan by an additional 300,000 shares to 700,000 shares
and reduced the term of future options granted under the Plan to seven years. In May 2008, Harmonic
stockholders approved amendments to the Plan to, among other things, increase the maximum number of
shares of common stock authorized for issuance by an additional 100,000 to 800,000 shares, and to
rename the Plan the 2002 Director Stock Plan. Harmonic had a total of 396,000 shares of Common
Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan as of April 2, 2010. The Plan provides for the grant of
non-statutory stock options or restricted stock units to certain non-employee directors of
Harmonic. Restricted stock units, or RSUs, have no exercise price and vest either after one year or
the vesting date chosen for such award. Restricted stock units granted reduce the number of shares
reserved for grant under the Plan by two shares for every unit granted. Stock options are granted
at fair market value of the stock at the date of grant for periods not exceeding ten years. Initial
option grants generally vest monthly over three years, and subsequent grants generally vest monthly
over one year. During the three months ended April 2, 2010 and April 3, 2009, there were no restricted stock units
granted to non-employee directors.
A summary of share-based award activity during the quarter ended April 2, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Available |
|
|
for Grant
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
4,054 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
(725 |
) |
Restricted stock units granted |
|
|
(2,717 |
) |
Restricted stock units canceled |
|
|
78 |
|
Options canceled |
|
|
151 |
|
Options expired |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2010 |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The following table summarizes restricted stock units activity under the Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
Average Fair Value |
|
Aggregate Fair |
(In thousands except exercise price)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Value (1)
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units granted |
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units released |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
$ |
2,527 |
|
Restricted stock units canceled |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2010 |
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the fair value of Harmonic common stock on the date that the restricted stock
units vested. On the grant date, the fair value for these awards was $2.3 million. |
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
Weighted Average |
(In thousands except exercise price)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercise Price
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
10,499 |
|
|
$ |
9.44 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
5.56 |
|
Options canceled |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
8.38 |
|
Options expired |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
87.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2010 |
|
|
10,966 |
|
|
$ |
8.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and exercisable as of
April 2, 2010 |
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected-to-vest as
of April 2, 2010 |
|
|
10,851 |
|
|
$ |
8.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average fair value of options granted for the three months ended April 2, 2010 was
$3.18. The weighted-average fair value of options granted for the three months ended April 3, 2009
was $2.85.
The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding at April 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Outstanding
|
|
Stock Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
Range of Exercise |
|
Outstanding at |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Exercisable at |
|
Average |
Prices
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
(Years)
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In thousands, except exercise price and life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.19 -- 5.63 |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
$ |
4.21 |
|
5.66 -- 6.41 |
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
6.45 -- 8.17 |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
8.06 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
8.10 |
|
8.20 -- 8.93 |
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
8.36 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
8.39 |
|
8.95 -- 10.97 |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
9.64 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
9.65 |
|
11.05 -- 23.57 |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
19.92 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
20.57 |
|
31.56 -- 77.15 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
48.07 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
48.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,966 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.77 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average remaining contractual life for all exercisable stock options at April 2, 2010
was 3.3 years. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of all vested and expected-to-vest
stock options at April 2, 2010 was 3.9 years. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of
all vested and expected-to-vest restricted stock units at April 2, 2010 was 1.8 years.
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable at April 2, 2010 was $2.5 million. The
aggregate intrinsic value of stock options vested and expected-to-vest net of estimated forfeitures
was $2.9 million at April 2, 2010. Aggregate
intrinsic value represents the difference between our closing price on the
last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $6.32 as of April 2, 2010, and the exercise price
multiplied by the
14
number of options outstanding or exercisable. The intrinsic value of exercised
stock options is calculated based on the difference between the exercise price and the current
market value at the time of exercise. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised stock options was
insignificant during the three months ended April 2, 2010.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In May 2002, Harmonics stockholders approved the 2002 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the 2002 Purchase Plan) replacing the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective
for the offering period beginning on July 1, 2002. As a result of the adoption of the 2002 Purchase
Plan and subsequent amendments thereto, which amendments were approved by the Companys
stockholders, a total of 7.5 million shares have been approved for issuance pursuant to the 2002
Purchase Plan. In addition, in June 2006, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment to the
2002 Purchase Plan to reduce the term of future offering periods to six months which became
effective for the offering period beginning January 1, 2007. The 2002 Purchase Plan enables
employees to purchase shares at 85% of the fair market value of the Common Stock at the beginning
or end of the offering period, whichever is lower. Offering periods generally begin on the first
trading day on or after January 1 and July 1 of each year. The 2002 Purchase Plan is intended to
qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. During
the first three months of 2010 and 2009, the number of shares of stock issued under the purchase
plans was 420,066 and 352,071 at weighted average prices of $5.07 and $5.41, respectively. The
weighted-average fair value of each right to purchase shares of common stock granted under the
purchase plans during the first three months of 2010 and 2009 was $1.91 and $2.26, respectively. At
April 2, 2010, a total of 2,219,807 shares were reserved for future issuances under the 2002
Purchase Plan.
Retirement/Savings Plan. Harmonic has a retirement/savings plan which qualifies as a thrift plan
under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan allows participants to contribute up
to 20% of total compensation, subject to applicable Internal Revenue Service limitations. Harmonic
can make discretionary contributions to the plan of 25% of the first 4% contributed by eligible
participants up to a maximum contribution per participant of $1,000 per year. This employer
contribution was suspended during the first quarter of 2009.
Stock-based Compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation costs in our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and April 3, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Employee stock-based compensation in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employee stock-based compensation in operating expense |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employee stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
Amount capitalized into inventory |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
3,274 |
|
|
$ |
2,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
single option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Options
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
74 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
15
The expected term for stock options and the 2002 Purchase Plan represents the weighted-average
period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. Our computation of expected life
was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the
contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee
behavior.
We use the historical volatility over the expected term of the options and the 2002 Purchase Plan
offering period to estimate the expected volatility. We believe that the historical volatility, at
this time, represents fairly the future volatility of our common stock. We will continue to monitor
relevant information to measure expected volatility for future option grants and 2002 Purchase Plan
offering periods.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the
term of our employee stock options. The dividend yield assumption is based on our history and
expectation of dividend payouts.
NOTE 11: INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision includes U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign income taxes and is
based on the application of a forecasted annual income tax rate applied to the current quarters
year-to-date pre-tax income (loss). In determining the estimated annual effective income tax rate,
the Company analyzes various factors, including projections of the Companys annual earnings,
taxing jurisdictions, in which the earnings will be generated, the impact of state and local income
taxes, the Companys ability to use tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards, and available
tax planning alternatives. Discrete items, including the effect of changes in tax laws, tax rates,
and certain circumstances with respect to valuation allowances or other unusual or non-recurring
tax adjustments are reflected in the period in which they occur as an addition to, or reduction
from, the income tax provision, rather than being included in the estimated effective annual income
tax rate.
For the three months ended April 2, 2010, our effective tax rate was a benefit of 115% compared to
a provision of 90% for the same period a year ago, inclusive of
discrete items.
For the three months ended April 2, 2010, the
difference between our effective tax rate benefit of 115% and the
federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily attributable to various
discrete items, the differential in foreign tax rates, non deductible
stock-based compensation expense, and California research and
development credits. The discrete items recorded in the first quarter
of 2010 principally relate to a benefit associated with the reversal
of previously provided foreign income taxes due to expiration of
the statute of limitations and, to a lesser extent, a benefit
associated with the release of a portion of the valuation allowance
on certain California deferred tax assets. The reduction in the
valuation allowance on the California deferred tax assets is due to
an increase in the estimated amount of income that will be
apportioned to California, based on
anticipated changes in the geographic mix of sales.
For the
three months ended April 3, 2009, the difference between our
effective tax rate of 90% and the federal statutory rate of 35% is
primarily attributable to various discrete items, the differential in
foreign tax rates, non deductible stock-based compensation expense,
non-deductible acquisition costs related to the Scopus acquisition, and
California research and development credits. The discrete items
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 increased the effective tax
rate by approximately 60% which is principally related to new
California tax legislation, as more fully described
below, net of a reversal of previously provided foreign income taxes
due to expiration of the statute of limitations.
On
February 20, 2009, California enacted legislation, which among other things, provides for the
election of a single factor apportionment formula beginning in 2011. As a result of our anticipated
election of the single sales factor, we are required under applicable accounting guidance on
accounting for income taxes to compute our deferred taxes taking into account the reversal pattern
and the expected California tax rate under the elective single sales factor at the end of any
reporting period. For the first quarter of 2009, the impact of the new legislation resulted in a change
to the state effective tax rate used to compute the Companys
California deferred tax assets
resulting in a corresponding reduction to the amount of previously recorded California deferred tax
assets. In addition, we recorded an additional valuation allowance on certain California tax
attributes that were not expected be realizable in the foreseeable future given the expected decrease in the
amount of income that will be allocated to California under the single factor apportionment
formula.
In compliance with applicable accounting guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes,
the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits, which include interest and penalties of
approximately $52.3 million as of December 31, 2009, and approximately $50.0 million as of April 2,
2010. If all of these unrecognized tax benefits were recognized, the entire amount would impact the
provision for income taxes. We anticipate the unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by $2.9 million
in the next 12 months due to statute of limitation expirations.
16
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
During the quarter ended April 2, 2010, we recorded a net reduction of $0.8 million for interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions resulting in a balance at April 2, 2010 of $4.5
million.
The tax years 2002- 2009 remain open to examination by various federal, state and foreign taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject.
NOTE 12: NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to
common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of the common shares outstanding
during the period. The diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for the
three months ended April 3, 2009 because potential common shares, such as common shares issuable
under the exercise of stock options or the employee stock purchase plan, are only considered when
their effect would be dilutive.
The following table shows the potentially dilutive shares, consisting of options, restricted stock
units and ESPP shares, for the periods presented that were excluded from the net income (loss)
computations because their effect was antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive equity
awards outstanding |
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
12,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net income (loss) (numerator) |
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
(18,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares calculation (denominator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
96,684 |
|
|
|
95,306 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential common stock relating to
equity awards outstanding |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
97,344 |
|
|
|
95,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The Companys total comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
(18,843 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on
investments, net |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
336 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,965 |
|
|
$ |
(18,654 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
NOTE 14: SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate our business in one reportable segment, which is the design, manufacture and sales of
products and systems that enable network operators to efficiently deliver broadcast and on-demand
video services that include digital audio, video-on-demand and high definition television as well
as high-speed internet access and telephony. Operating segments are defined as components of an
enterprise that engage in business activities for which separate financial information is available
and evaluated by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and
assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer.
Our revenue by product sales is summarized as follows:
Product Sales Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Product sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video processing |
|
$ |
38,890 |
|
|
$ |
35,664 |
|
Edge and access |
|
|
35,544 |
|
|
|
24,243 |
|
Service and support |
|
|
10,388 |
|
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
$ |
67,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our revenue by geographic region, based on the location at which each sale originates, and our
property and equipment, net by geographic region is summarized as follows:
Geographic Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
42,592 |
|
|
$ |
32,118 |
|
Japan |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
7,818 |
|
International |
|
|
39,454 |
|
|
|
27,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
$ |
67,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
21,194 |
|
|
$ |
11,481 |
|
International |
|
|
7,556 |
|
|
|
8,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,750 |
|
|
$ |
19,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Customers. In the first quarter of 2010, sales to Comcast accounted for 14% of net sales. In
the first quarter of 2009, sales to Comcast accounted for 16% of net sales.
18
NOTE 15: GUARANTEES
Warranties. The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs at the time of product shipment.
Management periodically reviews the estimated fair value of its warranty liability and records
adjustments based on the terms of warranties provided to customers, historical and anticipated
warranty claims experience, and estimates of the timing and cost of specified warranty claims.
Activity for the Companys warranty accrual, which is included in accrued liabilities, is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
April 3, |
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
4,186 |
|
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
Scopus acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
Accrual for current period warranties |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
Warranty costs incurred |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
3,426 |
|
|
$ |
6,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit. As of April 2, 2010, the Companys financial guarantees consisted of
standby letters of credit outstanding, which were principally related to performance bonds and
state requirements imposed on employers. The maximum amount of potential future payments under
these arrangements was $1.0 million.
Indemnification. Harmonic is obligated to indemnify its officers and the members of its Board of
Directors pursuant to its bylaws and contractual indemnity agreements. Harmonic also indemnifies
some of its suppliers and customers for specified intellectual property matters pursuant to certain
contractual arrangements, subject to certain limitations. The scope of these indemnities varies,
but in some instances, includes indemnification for damages and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees). There have been no claims against us for indemnification pursuant to any of these
arrangements and, accordingly, no amounts have been accrued in respect of the indemnification
provisions through April 2, 2010.
Guarantees. As of April 2, 2010, Harmonic had no other guarantees outstanding.
NOTE 16: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On April 19, 2010, Arris Corporation filed a complaint in United States District Court in Atlanta,
alleging that Harmonics Streamliner 3000 product infringes four patents held by Arris. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief and damages. Harmonic has not been served in the case. Harmonic
is currently evaluating its position with respect to these patents. At this time, we cannot predict
the outcome of this matter. An unfavorable outcome of this matter could adversely affect our
business, operating results, financial position and cash flows.
An unfavorable outcome on any other litigation matter could require that Harmonic pay substantial
damages, or, in connection with any intellectual property infringement claims, could require that
we pay ongoing royalty payments or could prevent us from selling certain of our products. As a result, a
settlement or an unfavorable outcome on any other litigation matter could have a material adverse
effect on Harmonics business, operating results, financial position and cash flows.
Harmonic may be subject to claims that have arisen in the normal course of business. In the opinion
of management the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these matters in the aggregate will
not have a material adverse effect on the Company or its operating results, financial position or
cash flows.
NOTE 17: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 6, 2010, Harmonic entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Omneon Inc., a privately-held
company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California and organized under the laws of Delaware. Under the
terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, Harmonic would acquire Omneon for (i) $190 million in cash plus the aggregate exercise price of
vested stock options of Omneon, and subject to further adjustment based on Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash position and working capital position at the
time of closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common
stock. This represents a total purchase value of approximately $274
million, based on the closing price of Harmonic common stock on May
5, 2010, net of cash to be acquired of approximately $32 million. The cash portion of the purchase price is
subject to adjustment in the event that Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are more or less
than $32 million at closing, and is also subject to a working capital adjustment. All unvested stock options
and unvested restricted stock units issued by Omneon and outstanding at closing will be assumed by Harmonic.
The proposed acquisition is subject to the approval of Omneons stockholders, and Harmonic has
entered into voting agreements with holders of approximately 66% of Omneons outstanding shares of capital
stock, pursuant to which such Omneon stockholders agree to vote in favor of the transaction. The
proposed acquisition is also subject to other customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, and
is expected to close in the third quarter of 2010.
The proposed acquisition of Omneon is intended to strengthen Harmonics competitive position in the
digital media market and to broaden the Companys relationships with customers who produce and
distribute digital video content, such as broadcasters, cable channels and other major owners of
content. The acquisition is also intended to broaden Harmonics technology and product lines with
digital storage and play-out solutions which complement its existing video processing products.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, including statements related to:
|
|
Our expectation that customer concentration will continue for the foreseeable future; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that international sales will continue to account for a significant
portion of our net sales for the foreseeable future; |
|
|
|
Our belief that adverse economic conditions and tight credit markets may reduce capital
spending by our customers, which could have a material and adverse affect on sales of our
products; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that we will record a total of approximately $6.0 million in
amortization of intangibles in cost of sales in the remaining nine
months of 2010, excluding the impact of any amortization related to
the potential Omneon acquisition; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that we will record a total of approximately $1.6 million in
amortization of intangibles in operating expenses in the remaining
nine months of 2010, excluding the impact of any amortization related to
the potential Omneon acquisition; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that our capital expenditures will be in the range of $12 million to $13
million during 2010; |
|
|
|
Our belief that the net proceeds from our previously completed public offering of common
stock will be used for general corporate purposes, including payment of existing
liabilities, research and development, the development or acquisition of new products or
technologies, equipment acquisitions, strategic acquisitions of businesses, general working
capital and operating expenses; |
|
|
|
Our belief that our existing liquidity sources, including our bank line of credit
facility, will satisfy our requirements for at least the next twelve months; |
|
|
|
Our belief that near-term changes in exchange rates will not have a material impact on
our operating results, financial position and liquidity; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that sales to cable television, satellite and telecommunications
operators will constitute a significant portion of net sales for the foreseeable future; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that we will successfully complete the announced acquisition of Omneon
and we will be able to achieve the resulting benefits of the acquisition; |
|
|
|
Our expectation that we will make acquisitions in the future; |
20
|
|
Our expectation that our operations will be affected by new environmental laws and
regulations on an ongoing basis; |
|
|
Our expectation that an increasing percentage of our consolidated, pre-tax income will
be derived from and reinvested in our international operations and our expectations
regarding the associated tax rates; |
|
|
Our expectation that any ultimate liability of Harmonic with respect to certain
litigation arising in the normal course of business will not, in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect on us or our operating results, financial position or cash flows;
|
|
|
Our expectation that the proposed acquisition of Omneon will
close in the third quarter of 2010, if at all; |
|
|
Our expectation that the acquisition of Omneon would
strengthen Harmonics competitive position in the digital media
market and broaden our relationships with customers who produce
and distribute digital video content, such as broadcasters, cable
channels and other major owners of content, and that it would broaden Harmonics technology and product lines with digital
storage and play-out solutions which complement its existing video
processing products; and |
|
|
Our expectation that operating results are likely to fluctuate in the future. |
These statements involve risks and uncertainties as well as assumptions that, if they were to never
materialize or prove incorrect, could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected, expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include those set forth under Risk Factors below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and that are otherwise described from time to time in Harmonics filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Overview
Harmonic designs, manufactures and sells versatile and high performance video products and system
solutions that enable service providers to efficiently deliver the next generation of broadcast and
on-demand services, including high-definition television, or HDTV, video-on-demand, or VOD, network
personal video recording and time-shifted TV. Historically, the majority of our sales have been
derived from sales of video processing solutions and edge and access systems to cable television
operators and from sales of video processing solutions to direct-to-home satellite operators. We
also provide our video processing solutions to telecommunications companies, or telcos,
broadcasters and Internet companies that offer video services to their customers.
In the first quarter of 2010, Harmonics net sales of $84.8 million increased 25% compared to the
first quarter of 2009. The increase in sales in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the
corresponding period in 2009 was primarily due to increased demand from our domestic and
international cable customers for products and solutions related to VOD, M-CMTS and switched
digital video applications. Gross margins increased in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the
corresponding period in 2009 due to higher sales volumes in 2010 and, in addition, from reduced
provisions for excess and obsolete inventory which were recorded in the first quarter of 2009
resulting from the discontinuance of certain Scopus products and employee severance costs.
Historically, a majority of our net sales have been to relatively few customers, and due in
part to the consolidation of ownership of cable television and direct
broadcast satellite systems,
we expect this customer concentration to continue for the foreseeable future. In the first quarter
of 2010 and 2009, sales to Comcast accounted for 14% and 16% of net sales, respectively.
Sales to customers outside of the U.S. in the first quarter of 2010 represented 50% of net
sales, compared to 53% for the comparable period in 2009. A significant portion of international
sales are made to distributors and system integrators, which are generally responsible for
importing the products and providing installation and technical support and service to customers
within their territory. Sales denominated in foreign currencies were approximately 7% in the first
three months of 2010 compared to 5% for the comparable period of 2009. We expect international
sales to continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales for the foreseeable future.
Harmonic often recognizes a significant portion, or the majority, of its revenues in the last
month of the quarter. Harmonic establishes its expenditure levels for product development and other
operating expenses based on projected sales levels, and expenses are relatively fixed in the short
term. Accordingly, variations in timing of sales can cause significant fluctuations in operating
results. Harmonics expenses for any given quarter are typically based on expected sales and if
sales are below expectations, our operating results may be adversely impacted by our inability to
adjust spending to compensate for the shortfall. In addition, because a significant portion of
Harmonics
21
business is derived from orders placed by a limited number of large customers, the timing of such
orders can also cause significant fluctuations in our operating results.
On May 6, 2010, Harmonic entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Omneon Inc., or Omneon, a privately-held company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California
and organized under the laws of Delaware. Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, Harmonic would acquire Omneon for (i) $190 million in cash plus the aggregate exercise price of vested stock
options of Omneon, and subject to further adjustment based on
Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash position and working capital position at the time of
closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common stock. This
represents a total purchase value of approximately $274 million,
based on the closing price of Harmonic common stock on May 5, 2010,
net of cash to be acquired of approximately $32 million. The cash portion of the purchase price is subject to
adjustment in the event that Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are more or less than $32 million at closing, and is also subject to a working capital adjustment. All unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units issued
by Omneon and outstanding at closing will be assumed by Harmonic. The proposed acquisition is subject to the approval of Omneons stockholders, and Harmonic has entered into voting agreements with holders of approximately 66%
of Omneons outstanding shares of capital stock, pursuant to which such Omneon stockholders agree to vote in favor of the transaction. The proposed acquisition is also subject to other
customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2010.
The proposed acquisition of Omneon is intended to strengthen Harmonics competitive position in the digital media market and to broaden our
relationships with customers who produce and distribute digital video content, such as broadcasters, cable channels and other major owners of content. The acquisition is also intended to broaden Harmonics technology and product lines
with digital storage and play-out solutions which complement our existing video processing products.
On March 12, 2009, Harmonic completed the acquisition of Scopus Video Networks Ltd., or Scopus, a
publicly traded company based in Israel. The purchase price, net of $23.3 million of cash acquired,
was $62.4 million, which was paid from Harmonics existing cash balances. Scopus engages in the development
and support of digital video networking products that allow network operators to transmit, process,
and manage digital video content. Scopus primary products include integrated receivers/decoders
(IRD), intelligent video gateways (IVG), and encoders. In addition, Scopus markets
multiplexers, network management systems (NMS), and other ancillary technology to its customers.
The acquisition of Scopus strengthens Harmonics technology and market leadership, particularly in
the broadcast contribution and distribution markets. The acquisition extends Harmonics
diversification strategy, providing it with an expanded international sales force and global
customer base, particularly in video broadcast, contribution and distribution markets, as well as
complementary video processing technology and expanded research and development capability. Results
of operations for the Scopus acquisition are reflected in the accompanying Harmonic financial data
from the effective date of the acquisition, which was March 12, 2009. Sales of Scopus product are
primarily reported within the video processing product line.
We are in the process of expanding our international operations and staff to better support
our expansion into international markets. This expansion includes the implementation of an
international structure that includes, among other things, an international support center in
Europe, a research and development cost-sharing arrangement, certain licenses and other contractual
arrangements by and among the Company and its wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. Our
foreign subsidiaries have acquired certain rights to sell our existing intellectual property and
intellectual property that will be developed or licensed in the future. As a result of these
changes and an expanding customer base internationally, we expect that an increasing percentage of
our consolidated pre-tax income will be derived from, and reinvested in, our international
operations. We anticipate that this pre-tax income will be subject to foreign tax at relatively
lower tax rates when compared to the United States federal statutory tax rate in future periods.
However, the current administration has begun to put forward proposals that may, if enacted, limit
the ability of U.S. companies to continue to defer U.S. income taxes on foreign earnings.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures requires Harmonic to make
judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
the disclosure of contingencies and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of
revenue and expenses if different judgments or different estimates were made.
22
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the annual consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2010 and the notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three month period ended April 2, 2010, included herein. Our most
critical accounting policies have not changed since December 31, 2009 and include the following:
|
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and discounts; |
|
|
Valuation of inventories; |
|
|
Impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets; |
|
|
Restructuring costs and accruals for excess facilities; |
|
|
Assessment of the probability of the outcome of litigation; |
|
|
Accounting for income taxes, and |
|
|
Stock-based compensation. |
Results of Operations
Harmonics historical condensed consolidated statements of operations data for the first
quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2009 as a percentage of net sales, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Product sales |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
Service revenue |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product cost of sales |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Service cost of sales |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Net Sales Consolidated
Harmonics consolidated net sales in the first quarter of 2010 compared with the corresponding
period in 2009 are presented in the table below. Also presented are the related dollar and
percentage change in consolidated net sales in the first quarter of 2010 compared with the
corresponding period in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Product Sales Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video Processing |
|
$ |
38,890 |
|
|
$ |
35,664 |
|
Edge and Access |
|
|
35,544 |
|
|
|
24,243 |
|
Service and Support |
|
|
10,388 |
|
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
$ |
67,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video Processing increase |
|
$ |
3,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
Edge and Access increase |
|
|
11,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and Support increase |
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase |
|
$ |
17,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video Processing percent change |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Edge and Access percent change |
|
|
46.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Service and Support percent change |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total percent change |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009 principally
due to increased demand from our domestic and international cable customers as well as an improved
economic environment worldwide. Sales of video processing products were higher in the first quarter
of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to increased sales of products
resulting from the acquisition of Scopus. The increase in sales of products of the edge and access
products line in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to
an increase in sales of edge products, such as our Narrowcast Services Gateway Edge QAM products,
which are used for VOD, M-CMTS and switched digital video applications to domestic and
international cable operators. The increase in sales of service and support in the first quarter of 2010
compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily from increased support revenue as a result of an
expanded customer base and the timing in the renewal of pre-existing maintenance agreements.
Net Sales Geographic
Harmonics domestic and international net sales in the first quarter of 2010 compared with the
corresponding period in 2009 are presented in the table below. Also presented are the related
dollar and percentage change in domestic and international net sales in the first quarter of 2010
compared with the corresponding period in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Geographic Sales Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
42,592 |
|
|
$ |
32,118 |
|
International |
|
|
42,230 |
|
|
|
35,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
$ |
67,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. increase |
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
International increase |
|
|
6,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase |
|
$ |
17,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. percent change |
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
International percent change |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total percent change |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
24
The increased U.S. sales in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the corresponding period in 2009
were principally due to increased demand from our domestic cable customers for edge products used
in VOD, M-CMTS and switched digital video and increased support revenue.
International sales in the first quarter of 2010 increased compared to the corresponding period in
2009 primarily due to increased demand from our international cable
customers and sales of Scopus products. International sales increased in the first quarter of 2010
compared to the corresponding period in 2009 primarily in the European, Middle East and Canadian
markets. We expect that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of
our net sales for the foreseeable future.
Gross Profit
Harmonics gross profit and gross profit as a percentage of consolidated net sales in the first
quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009 are presented in the table below.
Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change in gross profit in the first quarter of
2010 as compared with the corresponding period in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
40,806 |
|
|
$ |
25,385 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
48.1 |
% |
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
$ |
15,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
60.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The increase in gross profit in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the corresponding period
in 2009 was primarily due to higher sales in 2010, and a decrease in provisions totaling $6.5
million recorded in 2009 primarily for excess and obsolete inventories associated with the
discontinuance of certain Scopus products and employee severance costs principally related to the
integration of Scopus into Harmonic. The gross margin percentage of 48.1% in the first quarter of
2010 compared to 37.5% in the first quarter of 2009 was higher mainly due to lower provisions for
excess and obsolete inventories, which were partially offset by higher freight expense. In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $6.5 million to cost of sales as a result of the
discontinuance of certain Scopus products and severance costs related to terminated employees.
Additionally, the Company recorded severance costs related to terminated employees in its
California operations during the first quarter of 2009, which were also included in cost of
sales.
In the first quarter of 2010, $2.1 million of amortization of intangibles was included in cost of
sales compared to $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2009. The higher amortization of intangible
expense in the first quarter of 2010 was due to the amortization of intangibles arising from the
Scopus acquisition which was completed in March 2009. We expect to record approximately $6.0
million in amortization of intangibles expenses in cost of sales in the remaining nine months of
2010 related to intangible assets acquired in connection with the
acquisitions of Entone Technologies, Inc., Rhozet Corporation and Scopus
Video Networks Ltd.
25
Research and Development
Harmonics research and development expense and the expense as a percentage of consolidated net
sales in the first quarter of 2010, as compared with the corresponding period of 2009, are
presented in the table below. Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change in
research and development expense in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding
period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Research and development expense |
|
$ |
16,966 |
|
|
$ |
14,496 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expense in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the
corresponding period in 2009 was primarily the result of increased compensation expense of $1.0
million, increased facilities expense of $0.7 million, increased outside engineering services of
$0.4 million and increased stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million. The increased
compensation expense is primarily due to increased headcount related
to the Scopus acquisition as well as
additional hiring of employees engaged in engineering activities. The increased facilities expense is primarily due to the
additional facilities, such as building leases and overhead, assumed in connection with the Scopus
acquisition.
Selling, General and Administrative
Harmonics selling, general and administrative expense and the expense as a percentage of
consolidated net sales in the first quarter of 2010, as compared with the corresponding period of
2009, are presented in the table below. Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change
in selling, general and administrative expense in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the
corresponding period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
20,845 |
|
|
$ |
21,290 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease |
|
$ |
(445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expense in the first quarter of 2010 compared
to the corresponding period in 2009 was primarily a result of lower acquisition-related expenses of
$3.4 million associated with the purchase of Scopus during the first quarter of 2009, which was
partially offset by increased compensation expense of $0.8 million, increased facilities expense of
$0.6 million, increased stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million, increased bad debt
expense of $0.4 million and increased travel expense of $0.4 million. The increased compensation
expense is primarily due to increased headcount related to the Scopus acquisition and higher commission
expense resulting from increased net sales in 2010. The increased
facilities expense is primarily due
to the additional facilities, such as building leases and overhead, assumed in connection with the Scopus
acquisition.
26
Amortization of Intangibles
Harmonics amortization of intangible assets and the expense as a percentage of consolidated net
sales in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009 are presented
in the table below. Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change in amortization of
intangible assets in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The increase in the amortization of intangibles expense in the first quarter of 2010 compared to
the corresponding period in 2009 was primarily due to the amortization of intangible assets obtained in
connection with the acquisition of Scopus during the first quarter of 2009. Harmonic expects to
record a total of approximately $1.6 million in amortization of intangibles expense in operating
expenses in the remaining nine months of 2010 due to the amortization of intangible assets
resulting from the acquisitions of Entone, Rhozet and Scopus.
Interest Income, Net
Harmonics interest income, net, and interest income, net, as a percentage of consolidated net
sales in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009, are presented
in the table below. Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change in interest income,
net, in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease |
|
$ |
(974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
(71.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest income, net, in the first three months of 2010 compared to the
corresponding period of 2009 was due primarily to the lower interest
rates earned on Harmonics
cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investment portfolio balances during the first quarter of
2010.
Other Expense, Net
Harmonics other expense, net, and other expense, net, as a percentage of consolidated net sales in
the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009, are presented in the
table below. Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change in other expense, net, in
the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Other
expense, net |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease |
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
(24.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
27
The
decrease in other expense, net, in the first quarter of 2010 compared
to the corresponding period of
2009 was primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses on accounts receivable
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
Income Taxes
Harmonics provision for income taxes, and provision for income taxes as a percentage of
consolidated net sales in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of
2009, are presented in the table below. Also presented are the related dollar and percentage change
in income taxes in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the corresponding period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
$ |
(2,845 |
) |
|
$ |
8,917 |
|
As a % of net sales |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease |
|
$ |
(11,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Percent change |
|
|
(131.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the provision for income taxes in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009 was primarily attributable to the reversal of foreign taxes previously accrued as
uncertain tax benefits that are no longer required due to an expiration of the statute of
limitations and to a lesser extent, a benefit associated with the
release of a portion of the valuation allowance on certain
California deferred tax assets, both of which are recorded as discrete
items.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
April 2, 2010
|
|
April 3, 2009
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(2,979 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,726 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
4,772 |
|
|
$ |
(66,234 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
As of April 2, 2010, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $267.8 million,
compared to $271.1 million as of December 31, 2009. Cash used in operations in the first three
months of 2010 was $3.0 million, resulting from net income of $5.3 million, adjusted for $7.4
million in non-cash charges and a $15.7 million net change in assets and liabilities. The
significant non-cash charges included stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization of
intangible assets. The net change in assets and liabilities included an increase in accounts
receivable due to
higher shipments in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of
2009, a decrease in accrued liabilities primarily from the payment of incentive compensation, an
increase in inventories primarily due to an increase in service and
demo inventories, and lower accounts
payable primarily from the payment of inventory purchases, which was partially offset by an
increase in deferred revenue.
To the extent that non-cash items impact our future operating results, there will be no
corresponding impact on our cash flows. After excluding the effects of these non-cash charges, the
primary changes in cash flows relating to operating activities resulted from changes in working
capital. Our primary source of operating cash flows is the collection of accounts receivable from
our customers. Our operating cash flows are also impacted by the timing of payments to our vendors
for accounts payable and other liabilities. We generally pay our vendors and service providers in
accordance with the invoice terms and conditions. In addition, we usually pay our annual incentive
compensation to employees in the first quarter.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $4.8 million for the three months ended April 2,
2010,
compared to net cash used in investing activities of $66.2 million in
the corresponding period in 2009.
The increase in net cash provided in the first quarter of 2010 is
primarily due to the net cash provided by the maturity of investments which was in excess of the
purchase of investments. The 2009 use of cash for investing
activities was primarily due to our acquisition of Scopus. Harmonic currently expects capital
expenditures to be in the range of $12 million to $13 million during 2010.
28
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.7 million for the three months ended April 2,
2010, compared to $2.0 million in the corresponding period in 2009, as a result of proceeds received primarily from the sale of our common stock under our 2002
Purchase Plan.
Harmonic has a bank line of credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, which provides for borrowings
of up to $10.0 million that matures on March 2, 2011. As of April 2, 2010, other than standby
letters of credit and guarantees (Note 15), there were no amounts outstanding under the line of
credit facility and there were no borrowings in 2009 or 2010. This facility, which was amended and
restated in March 2010, contains a financial covenant with the requirement for Harmonic to maintain
unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, net of credit extensions, of not
less than $35.0 million. If Harmonic is unable to maintain this cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments balance, Harmonic would not be in compliance with the facility. In the event
of noncompliance by Harmonic with the covenants under the facility, Silicon Valley Bank would be
entitled to exercise its remedies under the facility which include declaring all obligations
immediately due and payable. At April 2, 2010, Harmonic was in compliance with the covenants under
this line of credit facility. Future borrowings pursuant to the line would bear interest at the
banks prime rate (4.0% at April 2, 2010). Borrowings are payable monthly and are not
collateralized.
The
anticipated use of approximately $190 million in cash upon closing of the Omneon acquisition
will significantly reduce our cash balances. Nevertheless, we believe that our existing liquidity sources will satisfy our cash requirements for at least the
next twelve months. However, if our expectations are incorrect, we may need to raise additional
funds to fund our operations, to take advantage of unanticipated strategic opportunities or to
strengthen our financial position.
In addition, we actively review potential acquisitions that would complement our existing product
offerings, enhance our technical capabilities or expand our marketing and sales presence. For
example, on May 6, 2010, Harmonic entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Omneon. Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, Harmonic would acquire Omneon for (i) $190 million in cash plus the aggregate exercise price of vested stock options of Omneon, and subject to further adjustment based on Omneons cash, cash
equivalents and restricted cash position and working capital position at the time of closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price, which is expected to be funded out of
Harmonics existing cash balances, is subject to adjustment in the event that Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are more or less than $32 million at closing, and is also subject to a working capital adjustment. All
unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units issued by Omneon and outstanding at closing will be assumed by Harmonic. The proposed acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, and is expected
to close in the third quarter of 2010. Any future transaction of this
nature could require potentially significant amounts of capital or could require us to issue our
stock and dilute existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available, or are not available
on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, to develop new
products or to otherwise respond to competitive pressures.
Our ability to raise funds may be adversely affected by a number of factors relating to Harmonic,
as well as factors beyond our control, including the global economic slowdown, market uncertainty
surrounding the ongoing U.S. war on terrorism, as well as conditions in financial markets and the
cable and satellite industries. There can be no assurance that any financing will be available on
terms acceptable to us, if at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None as of April 2, 2010.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
There were no significant changes to our contractual obligations and commitments in the first
quarter of 2010 compared to the information presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. However, as noted above, On May 6, 2010, Harmonic entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization to acquire Omneon for an aggregate of (i) $190 million in cash plus the aggregate exercise price of
vested stock options of Omneon, and subject to further adjustment
based on Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash position and working capital position at the time of
closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price is subject to adjustment in the event that Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are more or less than $32 million at closing, and is also subject to a working capital adjustment. All
unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units issued by Omneon and outstanding at closing will be assumed by Harmonic.
The proposed acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact the operating results, financial position,
or liquidity of Harmonic due to adverse changes in market prices and rates. Harmonic is exposed to
market risk because of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as measured
against the U.S. Dollar and currencies of Harmonics subsidiaries.
29
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Harmonic has a number of international customers each of whose sales are generally denominated in
U.S. dollars. Sales denominated in foreign currencies were approximately 7% and 5% of net sales in
the first three months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company has various
international offices that provide sales support, engineering and systems integration services.
Periodically, Harmonic enters into foreign currency exchange contracts and options to manage
exposure related to accounts receivable and expenses denominated in foreign currencies. Harmonic
does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. At April 2, 2010, we had
forward contracts to sell Euros totaling $5.6 million that mature during the second quarter of
2010. While Harmonic does not anticipate that near-term changes in exchange rates will have a
material impact on Harmonics operating results, financial position and liquidity, Harmonic cannot
assure you that a sudden and significant change in the value of foreign currencies would not harm
Harmonics operating results, financial position and liquidity.
Interest Rate Risk
Exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to Harmonics investment
portfolio of marketable debt securities of various issuers, types and maturities and to Harmonics
borrowings under its bank line of credit facility. Harmonic does not use derivative instruments in
its investment portfolio, and its investment portfolio only includes highly liquid instruments.
These investments are classified as available for sale and are carried at estimated fair value,
with material unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income. There is risk
that losses could be incurred if Harmonic were to sell any of its securities prior to stated
maturity. As of April 2, 2010, our cash, cash equivalents and investments balance was $267.8
million. Based on our estimates, a 100 basis points, or 1%, change in interest rates would have
increased or decreased the fair value of our investments by approximately $1.8 million.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under
the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and
procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any
disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance
level.
Changes in internal controls.
On March 12, 2009, we acquired Scopus and, as a result, we have
begun integrating the processes, systems and controls relating to
Scopus into our
existing system of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with our integration
plans. In addition, various transitional controls designed to supplement existing internal controls
have been implemented with respect to the acquired processes and systems. Except for the processes,
systems and controls relating to the integration of Scopus, there have not been
any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
April 2, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its
internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On April 19, 2010, Arris Corporation filed a complaint in United States District Court in
Atlanta, alleging that Harmonics Streamliner 3000 product infringes four patents held by Arris.
The complaint seeks injunctive relief and damages. Harmonic has not been served in the case.
Harmonic is currently evaluating its position with respect to these patents. At this time, we
cannot predict the outcome of this matter. An unfavorable outcome of this matter could adversely
affect our business, operating results, financial position and cash flows.
Harmonic may be subject to claims arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of
management the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these matters in the aggregate will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company or its operating
results, financial position and cash
flows.
We depend on cable, satellite and telecom industry capital spending for a substantial portion of
our revenue and any decrease or delay in capital spending in these industries would negatively
impact our operating results and financial condition or cash flows.
A significant portion of our sales have been derived from sales to cable television, satellite and
telecommunications operators, and we expect these sales to constitute a significant portion of net
sales for the foreseeable future. Demand for our products will depend on the magnitude and timing
of capital spending by cable television operators, satellite operators, telecommunications
companies and broadcasters for constructing and upgrading their systems.
These capital spending patterns are dependent on a variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
the impact of industry consolidation; |
|
|
|
the status of federal, local and foreign government regulation of telecommunications and
television broadcasting; |
|
|
|
overall demand for communication services and consumer acceptance of new video and data
services; |
|
|
|
evolving industry standards and network architectures; |
|
|
|
competitive pressures, including pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
discretionary customer spending patterns; and |
|
|
|
general economic conditions. |
In the past, specific factors contributing to reduced capital spending have included:
|
|
|
uncertainty related to development of digital video industry standards; |
|
|
|
delays associated with the evaluation of new services, new standards and system
architectures by many operators; |
31
|
|
|
emphasis on generating revenue from existing customers by operators instead of new
construction or network upgrades; |
|
|
|
a reduction in the amount of capital available to finance projects of our customers and
potential customers; |
|
|
|
proposed and completed business combinations and divestitures by our customers and
regulatory review thereof; |
|
|
|
weak or uncertain economic and financial conditions in domestic and international
markets; and |
|
|
|
bankruptcies and financial restructuring of major customers. |
The financial difficulties of certain of our customers and changes in our customers deployment
plans adversely affected our business in the past. Recently, economic conditions in the countries
in which we operate and sell products have been very weak, and global economic conditions and
financial markets have experienced a severe downturn stemming from a multitude of factors,
including adverse credit conditions, slower economic activity, concerns about inflation and
deflation, rapid changes in foreign exchange rates, increased energy costs, decreased consumer
confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and
liquidity concerns and other factors. Economic growth in the U.S. and in many other countries has
slowed significantly or receded in recent years, and economic growth
may remain
sluggish during 2010, although there has been an increase in economic
activity recently. The severity or length of time that these adverse economic and financial
market conditions may persist is unknown. During challenging economic times, and in tight credit
markets, many customers may delay or reduce capital expenditures, which in turn often results in
lower demand for our products.
Further, we have a number of customers internationally to whom sales are denominated in
U.S. dollars. Over the past two years, the value of the U.S. dollar has fluctuated significantly
against many foreign currencies, which includes the local currencies of many of our international
customers. If the U.S. dollar appreciates relative to the local currencies of our customers, then
the price of our products correspondingly increases for such customers. These factors could result
in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales cycles, difficulties in collection of accounts
receivable, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. If the U.S. dollar
would weaken against many major currencies, there is no assurance that a weaker dollar will lead to
growth in our sales. Financial difficulties among our customers could adversely affect our
operating results and financial condition.
In addition, industry consolidation has in the past constrained, and may in the future constrain
capital spending among our customers. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will maintain or
increase our net sales in the future. Also, if our product portfolio and product development plans
do not position us well to capture an increased portion of the capital spending of U.S. cable
operators and other major customers, our revenue may decline and our operating results would be
adversely affected.
Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of one or more of our key customers, or a failure to
diversify our customer base, could harm our business.
Historically, a majority of our sales have been to relatively few customers, and due in part to the
consolidation of ownership of cable television and direct broadcast satellite systems, we expect
this customer concentration to continue in the foreseeable future. Sales to our ten largest
customers in the first quarter of 2010 and the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 accounted for approximately 51%, 47% and 58%
of net sales, respectively. Although we are attempting to broaden our customer base by penetrating
new markets, such as the telecommunications and broadcast markets, and to further expand
internationally, we expect to see continuing industry consolidation and customer concentration due
in part to the significant capital costs of constructing broadband networks. For example, Comcast
acquired AT&T Broadband in 2002, thereby creating the largest U.S. cable operator, reaching
approximately 24 million subscribers. The sale of Adelphia Communications cable systems to Comcast
and Time Warner Cable has led to further industry consolidation. NTL and Telewest, the two largest
cable operators in the UK, completed their merger in 2006. In the DBS market, The News Corporation
Ltd. acquired an indirect controlling interest in Hughes Electronics, the parent company of
DIRECTV, in 2003, and News Corporation subsequently sold its interest in DIRECTV to Liberty
Media in February 2008. In the telco market, AT&T completed its acquisition of Bell South in
December 2006.
32
In the first quarter of 2010, sales to Comcast accounted for 14% of our net sales. In fiscal year
2009, sales to Comcast accounted for 16% of our net sales. The loss of Comcast or any other
significant customer or any reduction in orders by Comcast or any significant customer, or our
failure to qualify our products with a significant customer could adversely affect our business,
operating results and liquidity. The loss of, or any reduction in orders from, a significant
customer would harm our business if we were not able to offset any such loss or reduction with
increased orders from other customers.
In addition, historically, we have been dependent upon capital spending in the cable and satellite
industry. We are attempting to diversify our customer base beyond cable and satellite customers,
including the telco market. Several major telcos have rebuilt or are upgrading their networks to
offer bundled video, voice and data services. In order to be successful in this market, we may need
to continue to build alliances with telco equipment manufacturers, adapt our products for telco
applications, take orders at prices resulting in lower margins, and build internal expertise to
handle the particular contractual and technical demands of the telco industry. In addition, telco
video deployments, including recent trials of mobile video services, are subject to delays in
completion, as video processing technologies and video business models are relatively new to most
telcos and many of their largest suppliers. Implementation issues with our products or those of
other vendors have caused, and may continue to cause, delays in project completion for our
customers and delay the recognition of revenue by Harmonic. Further, during challenging economic
times, and in tight credit markets, many customers, including telcos, may delay or reduce capital
expenditures. This could result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales cycles,
difficulties in collection of accounts receivable, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. As a result of these and other factors, we cannot assure you that we
will be able to increase our revenues from telco customers and other markets, or that we can do so
profitably, and any failure to increase revenues and profits from these customers could adversely
affect our business.
Our operating results are likely to fluctuate significantly and may fail to meet or exceed the
expectations of securities analysts or investors, causing our stock price to decline.
Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to continue to fluctuate in the
future, on an annual and a quarterly basis, as a result of several factors, many of which are
outside of our control. Some of the factors that may cause these fluctuations include:
|
|
|
the level and timing of capital spending of our customers, both in the U.S. and in
foreign markets; |
|
|
|
access to financing, including credit, for capital spending by our customers; |
|
|
|
economic and financial conditions specific to the cable, satellite and telco industries; |
|
|
|
changes in market demand; |
|
|
|
the timing and amount of orders, especially from significant customers; |
|
|
|
the timing of revenue recognition from solution contracts, which may span several
quarters; |
|
|
|
the timing of revenue recognition on sales arrangements, which may include multiple
deliverables; |
|
|
|
the timing of completion of projects; |
|
|
|
competitive market conditions, including pricing actions by our competitors; |
|
|
|
seasonality, with fewer construction and upgrade projects typically occurring in winter
months and otherwise being affected by inclement weather; |
|
|
|
our unpredictable sales cycles; |
|
|
|
|
the level and mix of international sales; |
33
|
|
the amount and timing of sales to telcos, which are particularly difficult to predict; |
|
|
new product introductions by our competitors or by us; |
|
|
our development of custom products and software; |
|
|
changes in domestic and international regulatory environments; |
|
|
market acceptance of new or existing products; |
|
|
the evaluation of new services, new standards and system architectures by many operators; |
|
|
the cost and availability of components, subassemblies and modules; |
|
|
the mix of our customer base and sales channels; |
|
|
the mix of products sold and the effect it has on gross margins; |
|
|
changes in our operating expenses and extraordinary expenses; |
|
|
impairment of goodwill and intangibles; |
|
|
the outcome of litigation; |
|
|
write-downs of inventory and investments; |
|
|
the impact of applicable accounting guidance that requires us to record the fair value of
stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase plan awards as
compensation expense; |
|
|
changes in our tax rate, including as a result of changes in our valuation allowance
against certain of our deferred tax assets, and changes in state tax laws including
apportionment, as a result of proposed amended tax rules related to the deferral of foreign
earnings; |
|
|
the impact of applicable accounting guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes that requires us to establish reserves for uncertain tax positions and accrue
potential tax penalties and interest; |
|
|
the impact of applicable accounting guidance on business combinations that requires us to
record charges for certain acquisition related costs and expenses instead of capitalizing
these costs, and generally to expense restructuring costs associated with a business
combination subsequent to the acquisition date; and |
|
|
general economic conditions. |
The timing of deployment of our equipment can be subject to a number of other risks, including the
availability of skilled engineering and technical personnel, the availability of other equipment
such as compatible set top boxes, our customers ability to negotiate and enter into rights
agreements with video content owners that provide the customers with the right to deliver certain
video content, and our customers need for local franchise and licensing approvals.
In addition, we often recognize a substantial portion, or majority, of our revenues in the last
month of the quarter. We establish our expenditure levels for product development and other
operating expenses based on projected sales levels, and expenses are relatively fixed in the short
term. Accordingly, variations in timing of sales can cause significant fluctuations in operating
results. As a result of these factors, or other factors, our operating results in one or more
future periods may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or investors. In
that event, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline.
34
The markets in which we operate are intensely competitive.
The markets for digital video systems are extremely competitive and have been characterized by
rapid technological change and declining average selling prices. Pressure on average selling prices
was particularly severe during previous economic downturns as equipment suppliers competed
aggressively for customers reduced capital spending, and we have experienced similar pressure
during the current economic slowdown. Our competitors for edge and access products include
corporations such as Cisco Systems, Motorola and Arris. In our video processing products, we
compete broadly with products from vertically integrated system suppliers including Motorola, Cisco
Systems, Technicolor and Ericsson and, in certain product lines, with a number of smaller
companies.
Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing
and other resources than us. Many of these large organizations are in a better position to
withstand any significant reduction in capital spending by customers in these markets. They often
have broader product lines and market focus and may not be as susceptible to downturns in a
particular market. These competitors may also be able to bundle their products together to meet the
needs of a particular customer and may be capable of delivering more complete solutions than we are
able to provide. Further, some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do, and
they have offered and in the future may offer their products at lower prices than we do or offer
more attractive financing terms, which has in the past and may in the future cause us to lose sales
or to reduce our prices in response to competition. Any reduction in sales or reduced prices for
our products would adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, many of
our competitors have been in operation longer than we have and therefore have more long-standing
and established relationships with domestic and foreign customers. We may not be able to compete
successfully in the future, which would harm our business.
If any of our competitors products or technologies were to become the industry standard, our
business could be seriously harmed. If our competitors are successful in bringing their products to
market earlier than us, or if these products are more technologically capable than ours, our sales
could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, certain companies that have not had a
large presence in the broadband communications equipment market have recently begun to expand their
presence in this market through mergers and acquisitions. The continued consolidation of our
competitors could have a significant negative impact on us. Further, our competitors, particularly
companies that offer products that are competitive with our digital video systems, may bundle their
products or incorporate functionality into existing products in a manner that discourages users
from purchasing our products or which may require us to lower our selling prices, resulting in
lower revenues and decreased gross margins.
Our future growth depends on market acceptance of several broadband services, on the adoption of
new broadband technologies and on several other broadband industry trends.
Future demand for our products will depend significantly on the growing market acceptance of
emerging broadband services, including digital video, VOD, HDTV, IPTV, mobile video services, and
very high-speed data services.
The effective delivery of these services will depend, in part, on a variety of new network
architectures and standards, such as:
|
|
video compression standards such as MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 for both standard definition and
high definition services; |
|
|
fiber to the premises, or FTTP, and digital subscriber line, or DSL, networks designed to
facilitate the delivery of video services by telcos; |
|
|
the greater use of protocols such as IP; |
|
|
the further adoption of bandwidth-optimization techniques, such as switched digital video
and DOCSIS 3.0; and |
|
|
the introduction of new consumer devices, such as advanced set-top boxes, personal video
recorders, or PVRs, and a variety of smart phone mobile devices, such as the iPhone. |
35
If adoption of these emerging services and/or technologies is not as widespread or as rapid as we
expect, or if we are unable to develop new products based on these technologies on a timely basis,
our net sales growth will be materially and adversely affected.
Furthermore, other technological, industry and regulatory trends will affect the growth of our
business. These trends include the following:
|
|
convergence, or the need of many network operators to deliver a package of video, voice
and data services to consumers, including mobile delivery options; |
|
|
the increasing availability of traditional broadcast video content on the Internet; |
|
|
the entry of telcos into the video business; |
|
|
the use of digital video by businesses, governments and educational institutions; |
|
|
efforts by regulators and governments in the U.S. and abroad to encourage the adoption of
broadband and digital technologies; |
|
|
the extent and nature of regulatory attitudes towards such issues as network neutrality,
competition between operators, access by third parties to networks of other operators, local
franchising requirements for telcos to offer video, and other new services such as mobile
video; and |
|
|
the outcome of litigation and negotiations between content owners and service providers
regarding rights of service providers to store and distribute recorded broadcast content. |
In 2006, Cablevision announced a plan to offer a network-based digital video recorder service to
its customers. In order for Cablevision and other cable companies to deliver a network-based
digital video recorder service broadly to their customers, they need to continue to enhance their
networks and distribution capabilities by upgrading their video distribution hardware and software,
which we believe will enhance the demand for our products and services.
Shortly following Cablevisions announcement that it planned to offer a network-based digital video
recorder service to its customers, several major entertainment networks and video production
studios sued Cablevision in federal court to enjoin Cablevision from offering this service without
securing licensing or programming rights from the content providers. This case was resolved in
favor of Cablevision. However, in the event that similar challenges against cable operators
offering network-based digital video recorder services are successful, cable operators may not be
able to provide a network-based digital video recorder service to their customers, which could
reduce the growth in demand for our products and services.
We need to develop and introduce new and enhanced products in a timely manner to remain
competitive.
Broadband communications markets are characterized by continuing technological advancement, changes
in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. To compete successfully, we must design,
develop, manufacture and sell new or enhanced products that provide increasingly higher levels of
performance and reliability. However, we may not be able to successfully develop or introduce these
products if, among other things, our products:
|
|
are not cost effective; |
|
|
are not brought to market in a timely manner; |
|
|
are not in accordance with evolving industry standards and architectures; |
36
|
|
fail to achieve market acceptance; or |
|
|
are ahead of the market. |
We are currently developing and marketing products based on recently established video compression
standards. Encoding products based on the MPEG-2 compression standards have represented a
significant portion of our sales since our acquisition of DiviCom in 2000. Newer standards, such as
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, have been adopted which provide significantly greater compression efficiency,
thereby making more bandwidth available to operators. The availability of more bandwidth is
particularly important to those operators seeking to launch, or expand, HDTV services. We have
developed and launched products, including HD encoders, based on these new standards in order to
remain competitive and are devoting considerable resources to this effort. In addition, we have
recently launched an encoding platform which is capable of being configured for both MPEG-2 and
MPEG-4, in both standard definition and HD formats. There can be no assurance that these efforts
will be successful in the near future, or at all, or that competitors will not take significant
market share in HD encoding. At the same time, we need to devote development resources to the
existing MPEG-2 standard which our cable customers continue to require. Also, to successfully
develop and market certain of our planned products, we may be required to enter into technology
development or licensing agreements with third parties. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to enter into any necessary technology development or licensing agreements on terms acceptable to
us, or at all. If we fail to develop and market new products, our business and operating results
could be materially and adversely affected.
We have made and expect to continue to make acquisitions, and such acquisitions could disrupt our
operations and adversely affect our operating results.
As part of our business strategy, from time to time, we have acquired, and continue to consider
acquiring, businesses, technologies, assets and product lines that we believe complement or expand
our existing business. For example, on May 6, 2010 , we entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire Omneon, a privately-held company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California and organized under
the laws of Delaware.
Under the terms of the definitive agreement, Harmonic would acquire Omneon for (i) $190 million in cash plus
the aggregate exercise price of vested stock options of Omneon, and
subject to further adjustment based on Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
position and working capital position at the time of closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price is subject to adjustment in the event that Omneons
cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are more or less than $32 million at closing, and is also subject to a working capital adjustment. The definitive agreement contains certain termination
rights for both Harmonic and Omneon, including a fiduciary termination right on the part of Omneon, and includes provisions requiring Omneon to pay Harmonic a termination
fee under certain circumstances. The proposed acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, and is expected
to close in the third quarter of 2010. In addition, on March 12, 2009, we completed the acquisition of Scopus Video
Networks Ltd., on July 31, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Rhozet Corporation and on December 8, 2006, we acquired the video networking software business of Entone
Technologies, Inc. We expect to make additional acquisitions in the future.
We may face challenges as a result of these activities, because acquisitions entail numerous risks,
including:
|
|
the possibility that an acquisition may not close because of, among other things, a failure of a party to satisfy the conditions to closing or an acquisition target entering into an
alternative transaction; |
|
|
difficulties in the assimilation and integration of acquired operations, technologies
and/or products; |
|
|
unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition transaction; |
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from the regular operations of the business and
the challenges of managing larger and more widespread operations; |
|
|
difficulties in integrating acquired companies systems, controls, policies and
procedures to comply with the internal control over financial reporting requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
|
|
adverse effects on new and existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; |
|
|
channel conflicts and disputes between distributors and other partners of us and the
acquired companies; |
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with in-process research and
development; |
|
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; |
|
|
the potential loss of key employees of acquired businesses; |
|
|
difficulties in the assimilation of different corporate cultures and practices; |
|
|
difficulties in bringing acquired products and businesses into compliance with applicable
legal requirements in jurisdictions in which we operate and sell products; |
|
|
substantial charges for acquisition costs, which are required to be expensed under recent
accounting guidance on business combinations; |
|
|
substantial charges for the amortization of certain purchased intangible assets, deferred
stock compensation or similar items; |
|
|
substantial impairments to goodwill or intangible assets in the event that an acquisition
proves to be less valuable than the price we paid for it; and |
|
|
delays in realizing or failure to realize the benefits of an acquisition. |
For example, the government grants that Scopus received for research and development expenditures
limits its ability to manufacture products and transfer technologies outside of Israel, and if
Scopus fails to satisfy specified conditions, it may be required to refund grants previously
received together with interest and penalties and may be subject to criminal charges.
37
Competition within our industry for acquisitions of businesses, technologies, assets and product
lines has been, and may in the future continue to be, intense. As such, even if we are able to
identify an acquisition that we would like to consummate, we may not be able to complete the
acquisition on commercially reasonable terms or because the target is acquired by another company.
Furthermore, in the event that we are able to identify and consummate any future acquisitions, we
could:
|
|
issue equity securities which would dilute current stockholders percentage ownership; |
|
|
incur substantial debt; |
|
|
incur significant acquisition-related expenses; |
|
|
assume contingent liabilities; or |
|
|
expend significant cash. |
These financing activities or expenditures could harm our business, operating results and financial
condition or the price of our common stock. Alternatively, due to difficulties in the capital and
credit markets, we may be unable to secure capital on acceptable terms, or at all, to complete
acquisitions.
Moreover, even if we do obtain benefits from acquisitions in the form of increased sales and
earnings, there may be a delay between the time when the expenses associated with an acquisition
are incurred and the time when we recognize such benefits.
If we are unable to successfully address any of these risks, our business, financial condition or
operating results could be harmed.
Conditions and changes in the national and global economic environments may adversely affect our
business and financial results.
Adverse economic conditions in markets in which we operate may harm our business. Recently,
economic conditions in the countries in which we operate and sell products have been weak, and
global financial markets have experienced a severe downturn stemming from a multitude of factors,
including adverse credit conditions, slower economic activity, concerns about inflation and
deflation, rapid changes in foreign exchange rates, increased energy costs, decreased consumer
confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and
liquidity concerns and other factors. Economic growth in the U.S. and in many other countries
slowed in the fourth quarter of 2007, remained slow or stopped in 2008, and slowed further or
remained relatively flat in 2009 in the U.S. and internationally. The global economic
slowdown led many of our customers to decrease their expenditures in 2009, and we believe that this
slowdown caused certain of our customers to reduce or delay orders for our products. Many of our
international customers, particularly those in emerging markets, have been exposed to tight credit
markets and depreciating currencies, further restricting their ability to build out or upgrade
their networks. Some customers have difficulty in servicing or retiring existing debt and the
financial constraints on certain international customers required us to significantly increase our
allowance for doubtful accounts in the fourth quarter of 2008.
During challenging economic times, and in tight credit markets, many customers may delay or reduce
capital expenditures. This could result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales
cycles, difficulties in collection of accounts receivable, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in
the United States or other key markets remain weak or deteriorate further, we may experience a
material and adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Broadband communications markets are characterized by rapid technological change.
Broadband communications markets are subject to rapid changes, making it difficult to accurately
predict the markets future growth rates, sizes or technological directions. In view of the
evolving nature of these markets, it is possible that cable television operators, telcos or other
suppliers of broadband wireless and satellite services will decide to adopt alternative
architectures or technologies that are incompatible with our current or future products. Also,
decisions by customers to adopt new technologies or products are often delayed by extensive
evaluation and qualification processes and can result in delays in sales of current products. If we
are unable to design, develop, manufacture and sell products that incorporate or are compatible
with these new architectures or technologies, our
business will suffer.
38
We may not realize the anticipated improvement in our operating results and other benefits expected
from our recently completed acquisition of Scopus, and we may not
realize the benefits to our business from the proposed acquisition
of Omneon, any of which could adversely affect our business and
cause our stock price to decline.
Our recently completed acquisition of Scopus involved the integration of two companies that had
previously operated independently. The integration of two previously independent companies is a
challenging, time-consuming and costly process. While the integration process began in March 2009,
when the Scopus acquisition was consummated, it has taken some time to substantially complete the
integration.
Further, we recently entered into a definitive agreement to acquire
Omneon, and expect to close the acquisition in the third quarter
of 2010.
It is still possible that the process of combining the companies could result in the
loss of key employees, the disruption of our ongoing businesses, or inconsistencies in standards,
controls, procedures, and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with
customers, suppliers, and employees. In addition, the successful combination of the companies
requires the dedication of significant management resources, which could temporarily divert
attention from the day-to-day business of the combined company. There can be no assurance that
these challenges will be met, and that we will realize benefits from
the acquisition of Scopus or the proposed acquisition of Omneon.
If we are unable to realize these benefits, our business and operating results may be adversely affected, and our stock price may decline.
We depend on our international sales and are subject to the risks associated with international
operations, which may negatively affect our operating results.
Sales to customers outside of the U.S. in the first quarter of 2010 and fiscal years 2009 and 2008
represented 50%, 49% and 44% of net sales, respectively, and we expect that international sales
will continue to represent a meaningful portion of our net sales for the foreseeable future.
Furthermore, a substantial portion of our contract manufacturing occurs overseas. Our international
operations, the international operations of our contract manufacturers and our efforts to increase
sales in international markets are subject to a number of risks, including:
|
|
a slowdown in international economies, which may adversely affect our customers capital
spending; |
|
|
|
changes in foreign government regulations and telecommunications standards; |
39
|
|
import and export license requirements, tariffs, taxes and other trade barriers; |
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
a significant reliance on distributors, resellers and other third parties to sell our
products and solutions; |
|
|
difficulty in collecting accounts receivable, especially from smaller customers and
resellers; |
|
|
compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA; |
|
|
the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws, treaties and technical
standards; |
|
|
fulfilling country of origin requirements for our products for certain customers; |
|
|
difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
political and economic instability, including risks related to terrorist activity; and |
|
|
changes in economic policies by foreign governments. |
In the past, certain of our international customers accumulated significant levels of debt and have
undertaken reorganizations and financial restructurings, including bankruptcy proceedings. Even
where these restructurings have been completed, in some cases these customers have not been in a
position to purchase new equipment at levels we have seen in the past.
While our international sales and operating expenses have typically been denominated in
U.S. dollars, fluctuations in currency exchange rates could cause our products to become relatively
more expensive to customers in a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales or
profitability in that country. A portion of our European business is denominated in Euros, which
subjects us to increased foreign currency risk. Gains and losses on the conversion to U.S. dollars
of accounts receivable, accounts payable and other monetary assets and liabilities arising from
international operations may contribute to fluctuations in operating results.
Furthermore, payment cycles for international customers are typically longer than those for
customers in the U.S. Unpredictable sales cycles could cause us to fail to meet or exceed the
expectations of security analysts and investors for any given period.
Our operations outside the United States also require us to comply with a number of United States
and international regulations. For example, our operations in countries outside the United States
are subject to the FCPA and similar laws, which prohibits United States companies or their agents
and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign official for the purposes of
influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or
retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity or obtain any unfair advantage.
Our activities in countries outside the United States create the risk of unauthorized payments or
offers of payments by one of our employees or agents, including those companies to which we
outsource certain of our business operations, which could be in violation of the FCPA, even though
these parties are not always subject to our control. We have internal control policies and
procedures and have implemented training and compliance programs for our employees and agents with
respect to the FCPA. However, we cannot assure you that our policies, procedures and programs will
prevent violations of the FCPA or similar laws by our employees or agents, particularly as we
expand our international operations. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could
result in criminal or civil sanctions, and this could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any or all of these factors could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
40
We face risks associated with having important facilities and resources located in Israel.
When we completed the acquisition of Scopus in March 2009, Scopus was headquartered and had a
substantial majority of its operations in Israel. This acquisition resulted in the addition of
221 employees based in Israel. In addition, we maintain a facility in Caesarea in Israel with a
total of 85 employees. The employees at the Caesarea facility consist principally of research and
development personnel. We have pilot production capabilities at this facility consisting of
procurement of subassemblies and modules from Israeli subcontractors and final assembly and test
operations. As of April 2, 2010, we had a total of 235 employees based in Israel, or approximately
28% of our workforce.
Accordingly, we are directly influenced by the political, economic and military conditions
affecting Israel, and this influence has increased with the acquisition of Scopus. Any significant
conflict involving Israel could have a direct effect on our business or that of our Israeli
subcontractors, in the form of physical damage or injury, reluctance to travel within or to Israel
by our Israeli and foreign employees or those of our subcontractors, or the loss of employees to
active military duty. Most of our employees in Israel are currently obligated to perform annual
reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces and several have been called for active military duty in
recent years. In the event that more employees are called to active duty, certain of our research
and development activities may be adversely affected and significantly delayed. In addition, the
interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its trading partners could significantly
harm our business. Terrorist attacks and hostilities within Israel, the hostilities between Israel
and Hezbollah, and Israel and Hamas, the conflict between Hamas and Fatah, as well as tensions
between Israel and Iran, have also heightened these risks. Current or future tensions in the Middle
East may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Fluctuations in our future effective tax rates could affect our future operating results, financial
condition and cash flows.
We have evaluated the need for a valuation allowance based on historical evidence, trends in
profitability, expectations of future taxable income and implemented tax planning strategies. As
such in 2008, we determined that a valuation allowance was no longer necessary for certain of our
U.S. deferred tax assets because, based on the available evidence, we concluded that a realization
of these net deferred tax assets was more likely than not. We continue to maintain a valuation
allowance for certain foreign deferred tax assets and recorded a valuation allowance on certain of
our California deferred tax assets in the first quarter of 2009 as a result of our expectations of
future usage of the California deferred tax assets. We are required to periodically review our
deferred tax assets and determine whether, based on available evidence, a valuation allowance is
necessary. In the event that, in the future, we determine an additional valuation allowance is
necessary with respect to our U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets, we would incur a charge
equal to the amount of the valuation allowance in the period in which we made such determination as
a discrete item, and this could have a material and adverse impact on our results of operations for
such period.
The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of
complex global tax regulations. We recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues
in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which,
additional taxes will be due. If payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the
reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we
determine the liabilities are no longer necessary. If the estimate of tax liabilities proves to be
less than the ultimate tax assessment, a further charge to expense would result.
We are in the process of expanding our international operations and staffing to better support our
expansion into international markets. This expansion includes the implementation of an
international structure that includes, among other things, an international support center in
Europe, a research and development cost-sharing arrangement, certain licenses and other contractual
arrangements between us and our wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. As a result of
these changes, we anticipate that our consolidated pre-tax income will be subject to foreign tax at
relatively lower tax rates when compared to the United States federal statutory tax rate and, as a
consequence, our effective income tax rate is expected to be lower than the United States federal
statutory rate. However, the current administration has begun to put forward proposals that may, if
enacted, limit the ability of U.S. companies to continue to defer U.S. income taxes on foreign
income. In addition, recent statements from the
IRS have indicated their intent to seek greater disclosure by companies of their reserves for
uncertain tax positions.
41
Our future effective income tax rates could be adversely affected if tax
authorities challenge our international tax structure or if the relative mix of United States and
international income changes for any reason. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our income
tax rate will be less than the United States federal statutory rate in future periods.
Changes in telecommunications legislation and regulations could harm our prospects and future
sales.
Changes in telecommunications legislation and regulations in the U.S. and other countries could
affect the sales of our products. In particular, regulations dealing with access by competitors to
the networks of incumbent operators could slow or stop additional construction or expansion by
these operators. Increased regulation of our customers pricing or service offerings could limit
their investments and consequently the sales of our products. Changes in regulations could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Negative conditions in the global credit and financial markets may impair the liquidity of a
portion of our investment portfolio.
The recent negative conditions in the global credit and financial markets have had an adverse
impact on the liquidity of certain investments. In the event we need or desire to access funds from
the short-term investments that we hold, it is possible that we may not be able to do so due to
market conditions. If a buyer is found but is unwilling to purchase the investments at par or our
cost, we may incur a loss. Further, rating downgrades of the security issuer or the third parties
insuring such investments may require us to adjust the carrying value of these investments through
an impairment charge. Our inability to sell all or some of our short-term investments at par or our
cost, or rating downgrades of issuers of these securities, could adversely affect our results of
operations or financial condition.
In addition, we invest our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of
investment vehicles in a number of countries with and in the custody of financial institutions with
high credit ratings. While our investment policy and strategy attempt to manage interest rate risk,
limit credit risk, and only invest in what we view as very high-quality securities, the outlook for
our investment holdings is dependent on general economic conditions, interest rate trends and
volatility in the financial marketplace, which can all affect the income that we receive, the value
of our investments, and our ability to sell them.
During 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 million relating to an investment in an
unsecured debt instrument of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. We believe that our investment
securities are carried at fair value. However, over time the economic and market environment may
provide additional insight regarding the fair value of certain securities which could change our
judgment regarding impairment. This could result in unrealized or realized losses relating to other
than temporary declines being charged against future income. Given the current market conditions
involved, there is continuing risk that further declines in fair value may occur and additional
impairments may be charged to income in future periods.
In order to manage our growth, we must be successful in addressing management succession issues and
attracting and retaining qualified personnel.
Our future success will depend, to a significant extent, on the ability of our management to
operate effectively, both individually and as a group. We must successfully manage transition and
replacement issues that may result from the departure or retirement of members of our senior
management. For example, Mr. Dickson, our Chief Financial Officer, recently announced his intention
to retire from Harmonic during 2010 and is expected to continue in his current position until his
replacement is hired and an appropriate transition period has elapsed. We cannot assure you that
changes of management personnel would not cause disruption to our operations or customer
relationships,
or a decline in our financial results.
42
In addition, we are dependent on our ability to retain and motivate high caliber personnel, in
addition to attracting new personnel. Competition for qualified management, technical and other
personnel can be intense and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
Competitors and others have in the past and may in the future attempt to recruit our employees.
While our employees are required to sign standard agreements concerning confidentiality and
ownership of inventions, we generally do not have employment contracts or non-competition
agreements with any of our personnel. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, the
inability to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring required
personnel, particularly senior management and engineers and other technical personnel, could
negatively affect our business.
Stock exchange regulations related to equity compensation could adversely
affect our ability to raise capital and our ability to attract and retain key
personnel.
Since our inception, we have used equity compensation, including stock options, restricted stock
units and employee stock purchase plan awards, as a fundamental component of our employee
compensation packages. We believe that our equity incentive plans are an essential tool to link the
long-term interests of stockholders and employees, especially executive management, and serve to
motivate management to make decisions that will, in the long run, give the best returns to
stockholders. The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued guidance that requires us
to record a charge to earnings for employee stock options, restricted stock unit grants and
employee stock purchase plan awards for all periods from January 1, 2006. This guidance has
negatively impacted and will continue to negatively impact our earnings and may affect our ability
to raise capital on acceptable terms. For the first quarter of 2010, stock-based compensation
expense recognized under this guidance was $3.2 million, which consisted of stock-based
compensation expense related to restricted stock units, stock options and employee stock purchases
plan awards.
In addition, regulations implemented by the NASDAQ Stock Market requiring stockholder approval for
all equity incentive plans could make it more difficult for us to grant options or restricted stock
units to employees in the future. To the extent that new accounting guidance make it more difficult
or expensive to grant options or restricted stock units to employees, we may incur increased
compensation costs, change our equity compensation strategy or find it difficult to attract, retain
and motivate employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We are exposed to additional costs and risks associated with complying with increasing regulation
of corporate governance and disclosure standards.
We are spending an increased amount of management time and external resources to comply with
changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure,
including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, SEC regulations and the NASDAQ Stock Market rules. In
particular, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires managements annual review and
evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting and attestation of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting by our independent registered public accounting firm
in connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-K for each fiscal year. We have
documented and tested our internal control systems and procedures and have made improvements in
order for us to comply with the requirements of Section 404. This process required us to hire
additional personnel and outside advisory services and has resulted in significant additional
expenses. While our managements assessment of our internal control over financial reporting
resulted in our conclusion that as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective, and our independent registered public accounting firm has attested that
our internal control over financial reporting was effective in all material respects as of
December 31, 2009, we cannot predict the outcome of our testing and that of our independent
registered public accounting firm in future periods. If we conclude in future periods that our
internal control over financial reporting is not effective or if our independent registered public
accounting firm is unable to provide an unqualified attestation as of future year-ends, investors
may lose confidence in our financial statements, and the price of our stock may suffer.
We may need additional capital in the future and may not be able to secure adequate funds on terms
acceptable to us.
We have generated substantial operating losses since we began operations in June 1988. We have been
engaged in
the design, manufacture and sale of a variety of video products and system solutions since
inception, which has
43
required, and will continue to require, significant research and development
expenditures. As of December 31, 2009 we had an accumulated deficit of $1.9 billion. These losses,
among other things, have had and may have an adverse effect on our stockholders equity and working
capital.
On May 6, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Omneon, a privately-held company
headquartered in Sunnyvale, California and organized under the laws of Delaware. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, Harmonic would acquire Omneon for (i) $190 million
in cash plus the aggregate exercise price of vested stock options of
Omneon, and subject to further adjustment based on Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash position and working capital position at the time
of closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price is subject to adjustment in the event that
Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are more or less than $32 million at closing, and is also subject to a working capital adjustment. The
proposed acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions and
regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the third quarter
of 2010. In order to complete this acquisition, we would be required
to expend a significant amount of our existing cash and
cash equivalents balance.
Taking into account the proposed acquisition of Omneon and the expected use of cash required to complete the transaction, we
believe that our existing liquidity sources will satisfy our cash requirements for at least the
next twelve months. However, we may need to raise additional funds if our expectations are
incorrect, to take advantage of unanticipated strategic opportunities, to satisfy our other
liabilities, or to strengthen our financial position. Our ability to raise funds may be adversely
affected by a number of factors relating to Harmonic, as well as factors beyond our control,
including weakness in the economic conditions in markets in which we operate and into which we sell
our products, increased uncertainty in the financial, capital and credit markets, as well as
conditions in the cable and satellite industries. In particular, companies are experiencing
difficulty raising capital from issuances of debt or equity securities in the current capital
market environment, and may also have difficulty securing credit financing. There can be no
assurance that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
In addition, we actively review potential acquisitions that would complement our existing product
offerings, enhance our technical capabilities or expand our marketing and sales presence. Any
future transaction of this nature could require potentially significant amounts of capital to
finance the acquisition and related expenses as well as to integrate operations following a
transaction, and could require us to issue our stock and dilute existing stockholders. If adequate
funds are not available, or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take
advantage of market opportunities, to develop new products or to otherwise respond to competitive
pressures.
We may raise additional financing through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or
additional corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. To the extent we raise additional
capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution. To the extent that
we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to
relinquish some rights to our technologies or products, or grant licenses on terms that are not
favorable to us. For example, debt financing arrangements may require us to pledge assets or enter
into covenants that could restrict our operations or our ability to incur further indebtedness. If
adequate funds are not available, we will not be able to continue developing our products.
If demand for our products increases more quickly than we expect, we may be unable to meet our
customers requirements.
If demand for our products increases, the difficulty of accurately forecasting our customers
requirements and meeting these requirements will increase. Forecasting to meet customers needs and
effectively managing our supply chain is particularly difficult in connection with newer products.
Our ability to meet customer demand depends significantly on the availability of components and
other materials as well as the ability of our contract manufacturers to scale their production.
Furthermore, we purchase several key components, subassemblies and modules used in the manufacture
or integration of our products from sole or limited sources. Our ability to meet customer
requirements depends in part on our ability to obtain sufficient volumes of these materials in a
timely fashion. Recent increases in demand on our suppliers and subcontractors from other parties
have caused sporadic shortages of certain components and products. In response, we have increased
our inventories of certain components and products and expedited shipments of our products when
necessary, which has increased our costs. Also, in previous years, in response to lower sales and
the prolonged economic recession, we significantly reduced our headcount and other expenses. As a
result, we may be unable to respond to customer demand that increases more quickly than we expect.
If we fail to meet customers supply expectations, our net sales would be adversely affected and we
may lose business.
We purchase several key components, subassemblies and modules used in the manufacture or
integration of our products from sole or limited sources, and we are increasingly dependent on
contract manufacturers.
Many components, subassemblies and modules necessary for the manufacture or integration of our
products are obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. For example, we depend
on a small private company for certain video encoding chips which are incorporated into several new
products. Our reliance on sole or limited suppliers, particularly foreign suppliers, and our
increased reliance on subcontractors involves several risks, including a potential inability to
obtain an adequate supply of required components, subassemblies or modules and, reduced control
over pricing, quality and timely delivery of components, subassemblies or modules. In particular,
certain optical components have in the past been in short supply and are available only from a
small number of suppliers, including sole source suppliers. These risks are heightened during the
current economic slowdown,
because our suppliers and subcontractors are more likely to experience adverse changes in their
financial
condition
44
and operations during such a period. While we expend resources to qualify
additional component sources, consolidation of suppliers in the industry and the small number of
viable alternatives have limited the results of these efforts. We do not generally maintain
long-term agreements with any of our suppliers. Managing our supplier and contractor relationships
is particularly difficult during time periods in which we introduce new products and during time
periods in which demand for our products is increasing, especially if demand increases more quickly
than we expect. Furthermore, from time to time we assess our relationship with our contract
manufacturers. In 2003, we entered into a three-year agreement with Plexus Services Corp. as our
primary contract manufacturer, and Plexus currently provides us with a majority of the products
that we purchase from our contract manufacturers. This agreement has automatic annual renewals
unless prior notice is given and has been renewed until October 2010.
Difficulties in managing relationships with current contract manufacturers, particularly Plexus,
could impede our ability to meet our customers requirements and adversely affect our operating
results. An inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any other circumstance that would require us
to seek alternative sources of supply could negatively affect our ability to ship our products on a
timely basis, which could damage relationships with current and prospective customers and harm our
business. We attempt to limit this risk by maintaining safety stocks of certain components,
subassemblies and modules. Recent increases in demand on our suppliers and subcontractors from
other parties have caused sporadic shortages of certain components and products. In response, we
have increased our inventories of certain components and products and expedited shipments of our
products when necessary, which has increased our costs. As a result of this investment in
inventories, we have in the past and in the future may be subject to risk of excess and obsolete
inventories, which could harm our business, operating results, financial position or cash flows. In
this regard, our gross margins and operating results in the past were adversely affected by
significant excess and obsolete inventory charges.
Cessation of the development and production of video encoding chips by C-Cubes spun-off
semiconductor business may adversely impact us.
Our DiviCom business, which we acquired in 2000, and the C-Cube semiconductor business (acquired by
LSI Logic in June 2001) collaborated on the production and development of two video encoding
microelectronic chips prior to our acquisition of the DiviCom business. In connection with the
acquisition, we have entered into a contractual relationship with the spun-off semiconductor
business of C-Cube, under which we have access to certain of the spun-off semiconductor business
technologies and products on which the DiviCom business depends for certain product and service
offerings. The current term of this agreement is through October 2010, with automatic annual
renewals unless terminated by either party in accordance with the agreement provisions. On July 27,
2007, LSI announced that it had completed the sale of its consumer products business (which
includes the design and manufacture of encoding chips) to Magnum Semiconductor, and the agreement
which provides us with access to certain of the spun-off semiconductor business technologies and
products was assigned to Magnum Semiconductor. If the spun-off semiconductor business is not able
to or does not sustain its development and production efforts in this area, our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flow could be harmed.
We rely on distributors, value-added resellers and systems integrators for a substantial portion of
our sales, and disruptions to, or our failure to develop and manage our relationships with these
customers and the processes and procedures that support them could adversely affect our business.
We generate a substantial portion of our sales through net sales to distributors, value-added
resellers, or VARs, and systems integrators. We expect that these sales will continue to generate a
substantial percentage of our net sales in the future. Our future success is highly dependent upon
establishing and maintaining successful relationships with a variety of distributors, VARs and
systems integrators that specialize in video delivery solutions, products and services, and our
reliance on such customers has increased since the completion of our acquisition of Scopus in the
first quarter of 2009.
We generally have no long-term contracts or minimum purchase commitments with any of our
distributor, VAR or system integrator customers, and our contracts with these parties do not
prohibit them from purchasing or offering products or services that compete with ours. Our
competitors may be effective in providing incentives to our distributor, VAR and systems integrator
customers to favor their products or to prevent or reduce sales of our products. Our distributor,
VAR or systems integrator customers may choose not to purchase or offer our products. Many of our
distributors, VARs and system integrators are small, are based in a variety of international
locations and may have relatively unsophisticated processes and limited financial resources to
conduct their business. Any significant disruption to our sales to these customers, including as a
result of the inability or unwillingness of these customers to continue purchasing our products, or
their failure to properly manage their business with respect to the
purchase of and payment for our products, could materially and adversely impact our business and
results of
45
operations. In addition, our failure to establish and maintain successful relationships
with distributor, VAR and systems integrator customers would likely materially and adversely affect
our business, operating results and financial condition.
We need to effectively manage our operations and the cyclical nature of our business.
The cyclical nature of our business has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant
strain on our personnel, management and other resources. Our purchase of the video networking
software business of Entone in December 2006 resulted in the addition of 43 employees, most of whom
are based in Hong Kong, and we added approximately 18 employees on July 31, 2007, in connection
with the completion of our acquisition of Rhozet. In addition, upon the closing of the acquisition
of Scopus, we added 221 employees on March 12, 2009, most of whom are based in Israel. Our ability
to manage our business effectively in the future, including any future growth, will require us to
train, motivate and manage our employees successfully, to attract and integrate new employees into
our overall operations, to retain key employees and to continue to improve our operational,
financial and management systems.
We are subject to various laws and regulations related to the environment and potential climate
change that could impose substantial costs upon us and may adversely affect our business, operating
results and financial condition.
Our operations are regulated under various federal, state, local and international laws relating to
the environment and potential climate change, including those governing the management, disposal
and labeling of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could
incur costs and fines, third-party property damage or personal injury claims, or could be required
to incur substantial investigation or remediation costs, if we were to violate or become liable
under environmental laws. The ultimate costs under these laws and the timing of these costs are
difficult to predict.
We also face increasing complexity in our product design as we adjust to new and future
requirements relating to the presence of certain substances in electronic products and making
producers of those products financially responsible for the collection, treatment, recycling, and
disposal of certain products. For example, the European Parliament and the Council of the European
Union have enacted the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive, which regulates
the collection, recovery, and recycling of waste from electrical and electronic products, and the
Restriction on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment
(RoHS) directive, which bans the use of certain hazardous materials including lead, mercury,
cadmium, hexavalent chromium, and polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), and polybrominated diphenyl
ethers (PBDEs) that exceed certain specified levels. Legislation similar to RoHS and WEEE has been
or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Japan, and China. Our
failure to comply with these laws could result in our being directly or indirectly liable for
costs, fines or penalties and third-party claims, and could jeopardize our ability to conduct
business in such countries. We also expect that our operations will be affected by other new
environmental laws and regulations on an ongoing basis. Although we cannot predict the ultimate
impact of any such new laws and regulations, they will likely result in additional costs or
decreased revenue, and could require that we redesign or change how we manufacture our products,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are liable for C-Cubes pre-merger liabilities, including liabilities resulting from the
spin-off of its semiconductor business.
Under the terms of the merger agreement with C-Cube, Harmonic is generally liable for C-Cubes
pre-merger liabilities. Harmonic and LSI Logic, which acquired C-Cubes spun off semiconductor
business in June 2001 and assumed its obligations, reached a settlement agreement in the second
quarter of 2009, which resulted in Harmonic reimbursing LSI Logic $1.0 million of the outstanding
liability to settle any future outstanding claims. As a result, the full amount of the estimated
obligations was transferred to LSI Logic in the second quarter of 2009. To the extent that these
obligations are finally settled for more than the amounts reimbursed by Harmonic, LSI Logic is
obligated, under the terms of the settlement agreement, to reimburse Harmonic.
46
Our failure to adequately protect our proprietary rights may adversely affect us.
We currently hold 42 issued U.S. patents and 17 issued foreign patents, and have a number of patent
applications pending. Although we attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through
patents, trademarks, copyrights, licensing arrangements, maintaining certain technology as trade
secrets and other measures, we cannot assure you that any patent, trademark, copyright or other
intellectual property rights owned by us will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged, that
such intellectual property rights will provide competitive advantages to us or that any of our
pending or future patent applications will be issued with the scope of the claims sought by us, if
at all. We cannot assure you that others will not develop technologies that are similar or superior
to our technology, duplicate our technology or design around the patents that we own. In addition,
effective patent, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain
foreign countries in which we do business or may do business in the future.
We believe that patents and patent applications are not currently significant to our business, and
investors therefore should not rely on our patent portfolio to give us a competitive advantage over
others in our industry. We believe that the future success of our business will depend on our
ability to translate the technological expertise and innovation of our personnel into new and
enhanced products. We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our
employees, consultants, vendors and customers as needed, and generally limit access to and
distribution of our proprietary information. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that the steps
taken by us will prevent misappropriation of our technology. In addition, we have taken in the
past, and may take in the future, legal action to enforce our patents and other intellectual
property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the
proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Such
litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could negatively affect
our business, operating results, financial position or cash flows.
In order to successfully develop and market certain of our planned products, we may be required to
enter into technology development or licensing agreements with third parties. Although many
companies are often willing to enter into technology development or licensing agreements, we cannot
assure you that such agreements will be negotiated on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The
failure to enter into technology development or licensing agreements, when necessary or desirable,
could limit our ability to develop and market new products and could cause our business to suffer.
Our products include third-party technology and intellectual property, and our inability to use
that technology in the future could harm our business.
We incorporate certain third-party technologies, including software programs, into our products,
and intend to utilize additional third-party technologies in the future. Licenses to relevant
third-party technologies or updates to those technologies may not continue to be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, the technologies that we license may not
operate properly and we may not be able to secure alternatives in a timely manner, which could harm
our business. We could face delays in product releases until alternative technology can be
identified, licensed or developed, and integrated into our products, if we are able to do so at
all. These delays, or a failure to secure or develop adequate technology, could materially and
adversely affect our business.
We or our customers may face intellectual property infringement claims from third parties.
Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and
related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. In particular, leading
companies in the telecommunications industry have extensive patent portfolios. From time to time,
third parties have asserted and may assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual
property rights against us or our customers. Our suppliers and customers may have similar claims
asserted against them. A number of third parties, including companies with greater financial and
other resources than us, have asserted patent rights to technologies that are important to us. Any
future litigation, regardless of its outcome, could result in substantial expense and significant
diversion of the efforts of our management and technical personnel. An adverse determination in any
such proceeding could subject us to significant liabilities, temporary or permanent injunctions or
require us to seek licenses from third parties or pay royalties that may be substantial.
Furthermore, necessary licenses may not be available on satisfactory terms, or at
all. An unfavorable outcome on any such litigation matters could require that Harmonic pay
substantial damages, or,
47
in connection with any intellectual property infringement claims, could
require that we pay ongoing royalty payments or could prevent us from selling certain of our
products and any such outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results, financial position or cash flows.
On April 19, 2010, Arris Corporation filed a complaint in United States District Court in Atlanta,
alleging that Harmonics Streamliner 3000 product infringes four patents held by Arris. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief and damages. Harmonic has not been served in the case. Harmonic
is currently evaluating its position with respect to these patents. At this time, we cannot predict
the outcome of this matter. An unfavorable outcome of this matter could adversely affect our
business, operating results, financial position or cash flows.
On July 3, 2003, Stanford University and Litton Systems (now Northrop Grumman Guidance and
Electronics Company, Inc.) filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California alleging that optical fiber amplifiers incorporated into certain of our products
infringe U.S. Patent No. 4859016. This patent expired in September 2003. The complaint sought
injunctive relief, royalties and damages. On August 6, 2007, the District Court granted our motion
to dismiss. The plaintiffs appealed this motion and on June 19, 2008 the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit issued a decision which vacated the District Courts decision and remanded for
further proceedings. At a scheduling conference on October 6, 2008, the judge ordered the parties
to mediation. Following the mediation sessions, Harmonic and Litton entered into a settlement
agreement on January 15, 2009. The settlement agreement provided that in exchange for a one-time
lump sum payment from Harmonic to Litton of $5 million, Litton (i) will not bring suit against
Harmonic, any of its affiliates, customers, vendors, representatives, distributors, and its
contract manufacturers for any liability for making, using, offering for sale, importing, and/or
selling any Harmonic products that may have incorporated technology that was alleged to have
infringed on one or more of the relevant patents and (ii) released Harmonic from any liability for
making, using, or selling any Harmonic products that may have infringed on such patents. Harmonic
paid the settlement amount in January 2009.
Our suppliers and customers may have similar claims asserted against them. We have agreed to
indemnify some of our suppliers and customers for alleged patent infringement. The scope of this
indemnity varies, but, in some instances, includes indemnification for damages and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees).
We may be the subject of litigation which, if adversely determined, could harm our business and
operating results.
In
addition to the litigation discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we may be
subject to claims arising in the normal course of business. An unfavorable outcome on any
litigation matter could require that we pay substantial damages, or, in connection with any
intellectual property infringement claims, could require that we pay ongoing royalty payments or
could prevent us from selling certain of our products. In addition, we may decide to settle any
litigation, which could cause us to incur significant costs. A settlement or an unfavorable outcome
on any litigation matter could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results,
financial position or cash flows.
We are subject to import and export controls that could subject us to liability or impair our
ability to compete in international markets.
Our products are subject to U.S. export controls and may be exported outside the United States only
with the required level of export license or through an export license exception, in most cases
because we incorporate encryption technology into our products. In addition, various countries
regulate the import of certain technology and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to
distribute our products or could limit our customers ability to implement our products in those
countries. Changes in our products or changes in export and import regulations may create delays in
the introduction of our products in international markets, prevent our customers with international
operations from deploying our products throughout their global systems or, in some cases, prevent
the export or import of our products to certain countries altogether. Any change in export or
import regulations or related legislation, shift in approach to the enforcement or scope of
existing regulations, or change in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by such
regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to
export or sell our products to, existing or potential customers internationally.
48
In addition, we may be subject to customs duties and export quotas, which could have a significant
impact on our revenue and profitability. While we have not encountered significant difficulties in
connection with the sales of our products in international markets, the future imposition of
significant increases in the level of customs duties or export quotas could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
The leases on the buildings at our main campus in Sunnyvale, California expire in September 2010,
and we may incur costs and experience delays in connection with moving to new facilities.
Our corporate headquarters and most of our U.S. operations are housed in two leased buildings in
Sunnyvale. These leases expire in September 2010. Consequently, we recently entered into a lease to
occupy a building close to our existing facilities. We are currently making plans to move to the
new facility prior to the expiration of our current lease. The new facility requires substantial
improvements and outfitting in order to be suitable for our occupancy. If construction is delayed,
or if occupancy permits are not granted in time, we may not be able to move prior to the expiration
of our current lease. If for any reason we are required to extend our current lease on a short-term
basis, we could incur additional rent expenses and other costs. Additionally, we expect to incur
moving costs and may also experience significant potential disruption to our business activities at
the time of moving to a new facility.
The ongoing threat of terrorism has created great uncertainty and may continue to harm our
business.
Current conditions in the U.S. and global economies are uncertain. The terrorist attacks in the
U.S. in 2001 and subsequent terrorist attacks in other parts of the world have created many
economic and political uncertainties that have severely impacted the global economy, and have
adversely affected our business. For example, following the 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S., we
experienced a further decline in demand for our products. The long-term effects of the attacks, the
situation in the Middle East and the ongoing war on terrorism on our business and on the global
economy remain unknown. Moreover, the potential for future terrorist attacks has created additional
uncertainty and makes it difficult to estimate the stability and strength of the U.S. and other
economies and the impact of economic conditions on our business.
The markets in which we, our customers and our suppliers operate are subject to the risk of
earthquakes and other natural disasters.
Our headquarters and the majority of our operations are located in California, which is prone to
earthquakes, and some of the other locations in which we, our customers and suppliers conduct
business are prone to natural disasters. In the event that any of our business centers are affected
by any such disasters, we may sustain damage to our operations and properties and suffer
significant financial losses. Furthermore, we rely on third-party manufacturers for the production
of many of our products, and any disruption in the business or operations of such manufacturers
could adversely impact our business. In addition, if there is a major earthquake or other natural
disaster in any of the locations in which our significant customers are located, we face the risk
that our customers may incur losses, or sustained business interruption and/or loss which may
materially impair their ability to continue their purchase of products from us. A major earthquake
or other natural disaster in the markets in which we, our customers or suppliers operate could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
Some anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and stockholder
rights plan, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.
We have provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, each of which could have the
effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an acquisition deemed undesirable by our Board
of Directors. These include provisions:
|
|
authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation,
dividend and other rights superior to our common stock; |
|
|
limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers; |
|
|
|
limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring business before special
meetings; |
49
|
|
requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at
meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our Board of
Directors; |
|
|
controlling the procedures for conduct and scheduling of Board and stockholder meetings;
and |
|
|
providing the Board of Directors with the express power to postpone previously scheduled
annual meetings and to cancel previously scheduled special meetings. |
These provisions, alone or together, could delay hostile takeovers and changes in control or
management of us.
In addition, we have adopted a stockholder rights plan. The rights are not intended to prevent a
takeover of us, and we believe these rights will help our negotiations with any potential
acquirers. However, if the Board of Directors believes that a particular acquisition is
undesirable, the rights may have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging that
acquisition. The rights would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to
acquire us on terms or in a manner not approved by our Board of Directors, except pursuant to an
offer conditioned upon redemption of the rights.
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203
of the Delaware General Corporation law, which prevents some stockholders holding more than 15% of
our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the
holders of substantially all of our outstanding common stock.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, our stockholder rights plan or
Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the
opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and
could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
Our common stock price may be extremely volatile, and the value of your investment may decline.
Our common stock price has been highly volatile. We expect that this volatility will continue in
the future due to factors such as:
|
|
general market and economic conditions; |
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in operating results; |
|
|
announcements of technological innovations, new products or new services by us or by our
competitors or customers; |
|
|
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by stock market analysts regarding us
or our competitors; |
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic
partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
|
|
announcements by our customers regarding end market conditions and the status of existing
and future infrastructure network deployments; |
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel; and |
|
|
future equity or debt offerings or our announcements of these offerings. |
50
In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general, and the NASDAQ Stock Market and the
securities of technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of individual companies. These broad market fluctuations have in the past and may in
the future materially and adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results.
Investors may be unable to sell their shares of our common stock at or above the purchase price.
Our stock price may decline if additional shares are sold in the market.
Future sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock by our existing stockholders in
the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, may cause the market price of
our common stock to decline. In addition, we may be required to issue additional shares upon
exercise of previously granted options that are currently outstanding. Increased sales of our
common stock in the market after exercise of currently outstanding options could exert significant
downward pressure on our stock price. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell
equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price we deem appropriate.
If securities analysts do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if
they downgrade our stock, the price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock relies in part on the availability of research and reports
that third-party industry or financial analysts publish about us. Further, if one or more of the
analysts who do cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price may decline. If one or more of these
analysts cease coverage of us, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause
the liquidity of our stock and our stock price to decline.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On May 6, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Omneon, a privately-held company
headquartered in Sunnyvale, California and organized under the laws of Delaware. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, Harmonic would acquire Omneon for (i) $190 million
in cash plus the aggregate exercise price of vested stock options of
Omneon, and subject to further adjustment based on Omneons cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash position and working capital position at the time
of closing, and (ii) 17.1 million shares of Harmonic common stock. All unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units issued by Omneon and outstanding at
closing will be assumed by Harmonic. The proposed acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2010.
The definitive agreement contemplates that Harmonic will submit to the California Commissioner of Corporations an
application for a permit pursuant to Sections 25121 and 25142 of the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968, so that, if approved, the issuance of Harmonic common stock as part of the merger consideration would be exempt from registration under
federal securities laws by virtue of the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Index
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and
Security Agreement between Harmonic Inc. and Silicon
Valley Bank dated March 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HARMONIC INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robin N. Dickson
|
|
|
|
Robin N. Dickson |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2010 |
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
Number
|
|
Exhibit Index
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and
Security Agreement between Harmonic Inc. and Silicon
Valley Bank dated March 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
53
exv10w39
Exhibit
10.39
AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (this
Amendment) is entered as of the 4th day of March, 2010, by and between Silicon Valley Bank
(Bank) and Harmonic Inc., a Delaware corporation (Borrower) whose address is 549 Baltic Way,
Sunnyvale, California 94089.
Recitals
A. Bank and Borrower have entered into that Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Agreement dated as of December 17, 2004, as amended by the First Amendment to Second Amended and
Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 16, 2005, Amendment No. 2 to Second
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006, Amendment No. 3 to
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 15, 2007, Amendment No. 4
to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 12, 2008 and Amendment
No. 5 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 4, 2009 (as may
be further amended, modified, supplemented or restated, the Loan Agreement).
B. Bank has extended credit to Borrower for the purposes permitted in the Loan Agreement.
C. Borrower has requested that Bank amend the Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date and
modify the financial covenant therein.
D. Bank has agreed to so amend the Loan Agreement, but only to the extent, in accordance with
the terms, subject to the conditions and in reliance upon the representations and warranties set
forth below.
Agreement
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to
be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have
the meanings given to them in the Loan Agreement.
2. Amendments to Loan Agreement.
2.1 Section 6.7 (Financial Covenant). Section 6.7 is amended and restated in its
entirety and replaced with the following:
6.7 Financial Covenant.
At all times, Borrower shall have unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (net of Credit
Extensions) of not less than $35,000,000.
2.2 Section 13 (Definitions). The following term and its definition set forth in
Section 13.1 is amended in its entirety and replaced with the following:
Maturity Date is March 2, 2011.
2.3 Exhibit C. Exhibit C to the Loan Agreement is replaced in its entirety by
Exhibit C hereto.
3. Limitation of Amendments.
3.1 The amendments set forth in Section 2, above, are effective for the purposes set
forth herein and shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed to (a) be a consent
to any amendment, waiver or modification of any other term or condition of any Loan Document, or
(b) otherwise prejudice any right or remedy which Bank may now have or may have in the future under
or in connection with any Loan Document.
3.2 This Amendment shall be construed in connection with and as part of the Loan
Documents and all terms, conditions, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set
forth in the Loan Documents, except as herein amended, are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
remain in full force and effect.
4. Representations and Warranties. To induce Bank to enter into this Amendment,
Borrower hereby represents and warrants to Bank as follows:
4.1 Immediately after giving effect to this Amendment (a) the representations and
warranties contained in the Loan Documents are true, accurate and complete in all material respects
as of the date hereof (except to the extent such representations and warranties relate to an
earlier date, in which case they are true and correct as of such date), and (b) no Event of Default
has occurred and is continuing;
4.2 Borrower has the power and authority to execute and deliver this Amendment and
to perform its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment;
4.3 The organizational documents of Borrower delivered to Bank on December 17, 2004
remain true, accurate and complete and have not been amended, supplemented or restated and are and
continue to be in full force and effect;
4.4 The execution and delivery by Borrower of this Amendment and the performance by
Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, have been duly
authorized;
4.5 The execution and delivery by Borrower of this Amendment and the performance by
Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, do not and will
not contravene (a) any law or regulation binding on or affecting Borrower, (b) any contractual
restriction with a Person binding on Borrower, (c) any order, judgment or decree of any court or
other governmental or public body or authority, or subdivision thereof, binding on Borrower, or (d)
the organizational documents of Borrower;
4.6 The execution and delivery by Borrower of this Amendment and the performance by
Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, do not require
any order, consent, approval, license, authorization or validation of, or filing, recording or
registration with, or exemption by any governmental or public body or authority, or subdivision
thereof, binding on either Borrower, except as already has been obtained or made; and
4.7 This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by Borrower and is the
binding obligation of Borrower, enforceable against Borrower in accordance with its terms, except
as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation,
moratorium or other similar laws of general application and equitable principles relating to or
affecting creditors rights.
5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and
all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.
6. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall be deemed effective as of March 3, 2010 upon
(a) the due execution and delivery to Bank of this Amendment by each party hereto and (b)
Borrowers payment to Bank of all Bank Expenses (including all reasonable attorneys fees and
reasonable expenses) incurred through the date of this Amendment.
[Signature page follows.]
In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed
and delivered as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANK |
|
|
|
BORROWER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Valley Bank |
|
|
|
Harmonic Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
|
/s/ Tom Smith |
|
|
|
By |
|
/s/ Patrick Harshman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Tom Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Patrick Harshman |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
President & CEO |
|
|
EXHIBIT C
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
|
|
|
TO:
|
|
SILICON VALLEY BANK
3003 Tasman Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95054 |
|
|
|
FROM:
|
|
HARMONIC INC.
549 Baltic Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 |
The undersigned authorized officer of Harmonic Inc. (Borrower) certifies that under
the terms and conditions of the Loan and Security Agreement between Borrower and Bank (the
Agreement), (i) Borrower is in complete compliance for the period ending _________ with all
required covenants, except as noted below, and (ii) all representations and warranties in the
Agreement are true and correct in all material respects on this date. Attached are the required
documents supporting the certification. The undersigned officer certifies that such documents were
prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) consistently applied
from one period to the next, except as explained in an accompanying letter or footnotes. The
undersigned officer acknowledges that no borrowings may be requested at any time or date of
determination that Borrower is not in compliance with any of the terms of the Agreement, and that
compliance is determined not just at the date this certificate is delivered.
Please indicate compliance status by circling Yes/No under Complies column.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Covenant |
|
Required |
|
Complies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance certificate
|
|
Quarterly within 45 days,
except together with report
on Form 10-K following Q4
|
|
Yes
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly financial statements
|
|
Quarterly within 45 days
|
|
Yes
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual financial statements (Audited)
|
|
FYE within 120 days
|
|
Yes
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Covenant |
|
Required |
|
Actual |
|
Complies |
Maintain at all times: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
$35,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
No |
Comments Regarding Exceptions: See Attached.
Sincerely,
HARMONIC INC.
BANK USE ONLY
Received by:
AUTHORIZED SIGNER
Date:
Verified:
AUTHORIZED SIGNER
Date:
Compliance Status: Yes No
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
Harmonic Inc.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Patrick J. Harshman, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harmonic Inc.: |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Patrick J. Harshman
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Harshman |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
Harmonic Inc.
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Robin N. Dickson, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harmonic Inc.: |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robin N. Dickson
|
|
|
|
Robin N. Dickson |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
Harmonic Inc.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
As of the date hereof, I, Patrick J. Harshman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Harmonic
Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended April 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit
accompanying such Report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
Date:
May 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick J. Harshman
|
|
|
Patrick J. Harshman |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
Harmonic Inc.
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
As of the date hereof, I, Robin N. Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of Harmonic Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying such Report and
shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Date:
May 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robin N. Dickson
|
|
|
Robin N. Dickson |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|